1 分•作者: calcifer•3 个月前
返回首页
最新
1 分•作者: sushrut1058•3 个月前
我正在构建一个由人工智能驱动的软件项目托管服务,旨在保护自由职业者和客户双方的权益。
* **自由职业者:** 您的知识产权(代码/代码库)始终保持私密。
* **客户:** 您将获得一个沙盒链接 + 详细报告(规格、最佳实践)+ 提示隐藏代码(在安全范围内)。
* **快速的人工智能驱动交付。**
付款仅在双方达成一致后才会释放。
加入候补名单以获得早期访问权限:https://bit.ly/4sTuPHe
2 分•作者: bpierre•3 个月前
1 分•作者: chalshik•3 个月前
我目前使用 Claude 代码,我想知道如果改用其他按使用量付费的开源工具,是否能在保持相同结果的同时降低成本?
13 分•作者: datajeroen•3 个月前
12 分•作者: MichaelRazum•3 个月前
This is already the second time I’ve observed this. People coming from highly respected universities are doing everything with AI. It’s even hard to argue with them, since it’s all cross-checked with ChatGPT and similar tools.<p>The picture of software development also looks completely different. Code that used to be readable in a few lines becomes 100 lines—overblown because, well, code is cheap. Now, I could argue that it makes things unreadable and so on, but honestly, who cares? Right? The AI can fix it if it breaks...<p>So what do you guys think? Is this the future? Maybe the skill to focus on is orchestrating AI, and if you don’t do that, you become a legacy developer—someone with COBOL-like skills—still needed, but from the past millennium.
1 分•作者: zingar•3 个月前
1 分•作者: thm•3 个月前
1 分•作者: fodmap•3 个月前
1 分•作者: pseudolus•3 个月前
1 分•作者: ColinWright•3 个月前
2 分•作者: jnord•3 个月前
1 分•作者: ludicrousdispla•3 个月前
2 分•作者: warthog•3 个月前
2 分•作者: ddtcx•3 个月前
1 分•作者: mpcsb•3 个月前
15 分•作者: giuliomagnifico•3 个月前
2 分•作者: wasimsk•3 个月前
我最喜欢的是 Brave 浏览器。
1 分•作者: benterix•3 个月前
1 分•作者: Sebastian_09•3 个月前