一个代码仓库获得了 3,278 个 star，同时 GitHub 显示 Andrej Karpathy 是该仓库的贡献者。
3 分•作者: newshackee•6 天前
一个 GitHub 仓库在一周内获得了 3,278 颗星，其中一天达到了 573 颗星的峰值。其相关的论文也在 Hugging Face 热门论文榜上名列第一。
在此期间，该仓库页面显著地将 @karpathy（Andrej Karpathy）列为贡献者，包括他的 GitHub 账号/头像。
相关的提交是由 @karpathy 署名并提交的。GitHub API 显示该提交未签名。
随后，一个 GitHub issue 质疑了这一点，称 Karpathy 从未做出贡献。该项目随后删除了该提交。
伪造 Git 提交作者元数据是一个已知的问题。这里有趣的是 GitHub 如何将该元数据作为可见的贡献者身份呈现出来，以及这在特定情况下可能扮演的角色。
参考：
https://github.com/EvoMap/AutoResearch/issues/8
https://github.com/EvoMap/AutoResearch/commit/4606e68
https://huggingface.co/papers/2608.17906
查看原文
A GitHub repo gained 3,278 stars in one week, peaking at 573 stars in a single day. Its associated paper also reached #1 on Hugging Face Trending Papers.<p>During that period, the repo page prominently showed @karpathy (Andrej Karpathy) as a contributor, including his GitHub account/avatar.<p>The associated commit was authored and committed as @karpathy. GitHub's API shows the commit was unsigned.<p>A GitHub issue later questioned this, saying Karpathy never contributed. The project subsequently removed the commit.<p>Forging Git commit author metadata is a known issue. What's interesting here is how that metadata was surfaced by GitHub as a visible contributor identity, and what role that may have played in this particular case.<p>Refs:
https://github.com/EvoMap/AutoResearch/issues/8
https://github.com/EvoMap/AutoResearch/commit/4606e68
https://huggingface.co/papers/2608.17906