桌面人工智能助手是否存在真正的市场空间，还是这个问题已经有了答案？
3 分•作者: Qhloi•15 天前
AGI 时代？
所以，现在我们拥有的所有这些“盯着你的屏幕并为你做事”的技术，比如 GPT-6 Astra、Muse、HeyClicky 和 Claude Fable 5.1，都属于 AGI 时代的最新成果。很有趣，想看看人们对这类工具的真实感受。
Astra 被描述为来自“AGI 时代”，Muse 有自己的虚拟机，能够读取你的屏幕，填写表格，甚至为你协商。而 HeyClicky 的理念相同，但更小巧，只有一个在你光标旁边的元素，可以和你一起读取屏幕，或者根据你的指令启动任务。
那么，它解决了你之前遇到的真正问题，还是仅仅是便利性被过度延伸了？你们有人真正使用过这些工具吗，还是很快就放弃了？你对这些工具的能力有什么自己的界限定义——如果它能标注你的屏幕，你觉得完全没问题，但除此之外，你是否因为它们目前不可靠而不想让它们主动点击/执行操作？请给出诚实直接的回答和观点。
查看原文
AGI era?
So now everything we have on these 'watches-your-screen-and-does-stuff-for-you' tech like GPT-6 Astra, Muse, HeyClicky,and Claude Fable 5.1 is the latest from the AGI era. Interesting to see what do people genuinely feel about this kind of tool.
Astra is described as being from "AGI era", Muse has its own VM and it will able to read your screen, fill out a forms or even negotiate for you while HeyClicky is the same idea but smaller and only one element sitting by your cursor to read your screen with you, or launch a task as per your commands.
So does it solve a genuine problem that you had before or just convenience that was translated into overreach? Has any of you actually put one of these to use, or did it get broken down quickly? And what is your own defined boundary regarding these tools capabilities - would it be completely fine if it annotates your screen, but asides of it, you wouldn't want it to initiate a click/action due to its current unreliability? Honest and direct answers and views.