HN 提问：9 月 8 日是通用人工智能日吗？
1 分•作者: rvz•17 天前
今天应该被庆祝，因为“通用人工智能”（AGI）现在真正有了意义。一个人工智能模型解决了纳维-斯托克斯方程问题，这是七个未解决的千禧年大奖难题之一。
请记住，在80亿人口中，只有1位（或不到5位）数学家（格里戈里·佩雷尔曼）解决了七个千禧年大奖难题中的一个，即庞加莱猜想。[0] 仅凭这一点就应该告诉你，一个人工智能解决了一个只有一个人能够解决的问题。这就是通用人工智能，再也没有可以移动的球门了。（抱歉，加里·马库斯）
我理解，与此同时，我们都感受到了10年前李世石（职业围棋选手）在AlphaGo比赛后所感受到的，即继续下去毫无意义，你可能会认为人工智能知道得最好。人工智能仍然有更多尚未发现的问题，需要人类去验证。
所以，不要为这个“90年问题”被解决而感到悲伤，而要为它正是通用人工智能应该有的样子而感到高兴。
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poincaré_conjecture
查看原文
Today should be celebrated as the day that "AGI" actually means something now. That an AI model gave a solution to the Navier-Stokes problem which was one of the 7 unsolved millennium prize problems.<p>Keep in mind that 1 (or less than 5) expert human mathematician (Grigori Perelman) out of 8 billion humans managed to solve 1 of the seven millennium prize problems which was the Poincaré conjecture. [0] That alone should tell you that an AI solved a problem which only 1 human was able to do. That is AGI, and there are no more goal posts to move. (Sorry Garry Marcus)<p>I understand that at the same time all of us are feeling what Lee Sedol (professional Go player) felt 10 years ago after the AlphaGo match, that there was no point in continuing and you might think that the AI knows best. There are still more problems yet to be discovered with AI and requires humans to verify.<p>So don't be sad that <i>this</i> 90 year problem was solved, just be happy that is <i>exactly</i> what AGI should be.<p>[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poincar%C3%A9_conjecture