告诉 HN：Anthropic 应该让 Claude 成为作者，我成为合著者
2 分•作者: xeonax•20 天前
Anthropic 一直在调整此行为，如下面的 bug 所示：
https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/66602
https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/69835
等等。
他们似乎过于执着于署名。一个大型语言模型（LLM）为什么要署名？它们无法拥有版权。
我建议它们将自己设为主要作者，这样它们也能承担责任。
这也能与那些沉迷于人工智能的组织/个人的现实相符。
您怎么看？
查看原文
Anthropic has been messing with this behavior as seen by the bugs below:
https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/66602
https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/69835
etc<p>They seem to be too hell bent on getting their attribution in. Why does an LLM even want to take credits for? They cannot own copyright.<p>I suggest they make themselves the primary author, so they can get the blame as well.
And would even match reality of orgs/people that have drank the AI fuelled cool-aid.<p>What say?