HN 读者分享：全职创业者的心声与烦恼（第一部分）
3 分•作者: lcampbellsoup•23 天前
我对副标题的讨论是开放式问题，带有上下文，而不是答案或解决方案。
<p>对抗“闪亮物体综合征”
<p>“闪亮物体综合征”的官方定义：一种习惯，即被新颖且令人兴奋的想法、工具或项目分心，从而放弃当前的工作。
<p>也许是因为人工智能，现在有太多的机会和太多的突破性创新正在发生。假设有一个挤满了 500 人的室内体育馆，一眼望去看台都坐满了人，每个人都拿着一张看起来像是中奖的彩票。你并不知道谁的彩票金额最高，也无法快速地按价值排序。但此刻，你正站在篮球场中央，拿着一个自行车轮胎打气筒，气喘吁吁地按着把手，给一个半瘪的篮球充气。此刻，哪张中奖彩票的金额高低似乎并不重要，因为它们都比你认为自己手中的金额高出万倍。那些人所做的事情显然是有效的（很明显），而你正在做的事情，也就是给这个球打气，似乎并没有奏效。但即使你允许自己停下来考虑拿走一张你能看到的彩票，你也会因为眼前有 500 张彩票而感到不知所措，甚至无法决定拿哪一张。你仍然怀疑，也许事情并不像那些拿着彩票的人看起来那么容易。也许他们也曾和你一样。所以，你很不情愿地决定继续给那个瘪了的篮球打气，只是幻想拥有其中一张中奖彩票。
<p>这不仅仅是关于金钱，而是每个人都想站在“事物的前沿”，那里才有真正的变革和结果。
<p>这正是“闪亮物体综合征”在人工智能时代给创始人带来的感受，尤其是那些有技术背景的人。就我个人而言，在制造自行车工具的经历中，即使它具有创新性并拥有强大的产品-市场契合度（PMF），也感觉像是固执地选择在数万亿美元正在易手的情况下继续给篮球打气。这不仅看起来和感觉起来是这样，我脑子里还有一打真正的商业想法，一旦深入研究，其潜在价值将是现在的 1000 倍。
<p>企业家们总是谈论“转型”，但真正的转型与追逐“闪亮物体”有什么区别？你不能声称转型仅仅是从没有 PMF 到拥有 PMF 的转变，因为从中等 PMF 到卓越 PMF 也是一次“有效的转型”。但如果那种你在转型前看到的“卓越 PMF”仅仅是：那个“闪亮物体”呢？你不能浪费你在当前 PMF 上投入的时间、精力和资源，结果却发现这次转型并不值得，然后重新开始。当然，一次好的转型和“闪亮物体综合征”的区别在于，你是否正确地判断了放弃当前 PMF 的努力去追求另一个是值得的。
查看原文
My discussion of subheaders are open-ended questions with context, not answers or solutions.<p>Combatting Shiny Object Syndrome<p>Shiny Object Syndrome official definition: the habit of getting distracted by new and exciting ideas, tools, or projects and abandoning your current work<p>Perhaps due to AI, there are too many opportunities and too much breakthrough innovation happening right now. Suppose there is a crowded indoor gymnasium of 500 people, the bleachers are full upon first glance, and each person is holding what appears to be a winning lottery ticket. You don’t really know who has the highest dollar ticket nor can you quickly sort them in value. But currently, you’re in the middle of the basketball court with a bicycle tire pump, breathing hard and pumping the handle to fill a half-deflated basketball with air. At the moment, it doesn’t really seem to matter which winning ticket is higher or lower in exact dollar value because they’re all ten thousand times more than what you think you’re holding. Whatever those people are doing is working (clearly) and whatever this is that you’re doing, pumping this ball I suppose, doesn’t seem to be working. But even if you allow yourself a pause to consider taking one of those tickets you can see, you’re too overwhelmed by the sheer truth that there are 500 of them in front of you to even decide on one to take. There is the restraint of a lingering suspicion that perhaps it’s not as easy as those people holding tickets make it seem. Perhaps they too felt the same way as you. So, you reluctantly decide to just keep pumping the deflated basketball, and only fantasize about having one of those winning tickets.<p>It’s not only about money, but everyone wants to be on the “cutting edge of things” where real change and results are.<p>This is exactly what shiny object syndrome feels like to a founder in the era of AI, especially one who has a technical background. And for myself personally building bicycle tools, even if it is innovative with strong product-market fit (PMF), it feels like stubbornly choosing to pump the basketball in the wake of billions and trillions of dollars moving between hands right now. It doesn’t just look and feel like that, I’m containing a literal dozen business ideas that on first dig would contain 1000x the amount of oil.<p>Entrepreneurs are all about “pivoting,” but truly what distinguishes a pivot from chasing a shiny object? One cannot claim a pivot is simply the transition from no PMF to having PMF, because going from mediocre PMF to exceptional PMF is a “valid pivot.” But what if that “exceptional PMF” you think you see from a pre-pivot perspective is simply that: the shiny object. You can’t afford to waste the time, effort, and resources you’ve put into your current PMF only to restart and find out the pivot wasn’t worth it. Of course, the difference between a good pivot and shiny object syndrome was whether you were right about throwing away your current PMF efforts for another.