关于Whoishiring用户界面的讨论
1 分•作者: gushogg-blake•26 天前
有人对“whoishiring”帖子有一个更用户友好的前端感兴趣吗？该帖子链接了四个前端，但没有一个看起来是为了方便使用而设计的，所以我也在想这是否是故意的——版主是否因为某些原因故意避开创建另一个类似 Reed 的招聘网站？
具体来说，我指的是像 Reed 这样的招聘网站，你可以通过说明你的所在地和你的求职意向来轻松地筛选职位。地点过滤器可以通过让你指定你的所在地、是否需要现场办公/远程办公以及你愿意通勤的时间来工作。相比之下，该帖子链接的四个前端：
* 一个似乎是基于标签，并使用自定义查询语法，例如“~us-based”表示“非美国”。真的有人在寻找“非美国的工作”吗？肯定有 99.9% 的人正在寻找他们所在城市的工作，或者远程工作，而不是“仅限[另一个国家]”。
* 一个允许通过 JS 正则表达式进行过滤——同样，我不想编程，我只想找工作。
* 另一个只是一个带有自定义查询语法的搜索框。
* 一个具有 AI 增强搜索功能，但我尝试的第一个查询就出现了无效结果（搜索词“适用于英国远程或现场的 JavaScript/TypeScript 工作”；结果却显示了仅限波兰/罗马尼亚的职位）。
查看原文
Would anyone be interested in a more user-friendly frontend to the whoishiring thread? There are 4 frontends linked in the thread but none of them seem aimed at ease of use, so I'm also wondering if this is deliberate - are the mods deliberately steering away from essentially creating another Reed-like job board for some reason?<p>Specifically, I'm talking about the fact that with job boards like Reed, you can easily filter jobs by stating where you are and what you're looking for. Location filters work by letting you specify where you are, onsite/remote, and how long you're willing to commute. Compare to the 4 frontends linked on the thread:<p>- One seems to be based on tags with a custom query syntax, e.g. "~us-based" for "not US-based". Is anyone really looking for "jobs that aren't in the US"? Surely 99.9% of people are looking for jobs either in their city, or remote and not "[another country] only".<p>- One allows filtering by JS regexes -- again, I don't want to program, I just want to look for a job.<p>- Another one is just a search box with another custom query syntax.<p>- One has AI-enhanced search, but the first query I tried came up with invalid results (search term "javascript/typescript jobs suitable for remote or onsite in UK"; brings up a job specifying Poland/Romania only).