最高法院是否会重新审视公共场所的隐私权？
3 分•作者: Molitor5901•大约 1 个月前
鉴于政府摄像头的数量众多，以及个人生活记录设备（例如 Meta 眼镜）日益小型化，最高法院是否会觉得有必要重新审视“美国诉诺茨案”（United States v. Knotts）？该案确立了“公开场合即无隐私权”的原则。
如今，随着人工智能的加入，公众对摄像头的担忧可能会引发一场广泛的反对浪潮，并催生类似于欧洲隐私法的相关法律。
查看原文
With so many government cameras, and increasingly shrinking personal life-blogging camera devices (i.e. Meta Glasses), might the Supreme Court feel it necessary to reexamine United States v. Knotts, which laid out the in-public, thus no privacy doctrine?<p>The public concern of cameras, now with AI, may lead to a broader backlash against them, and laws akin to privacy laws in Europe.