HN 排名是正常的吗？
2 分•作者: unclebucknasty•大约 2 个月前
我回来寻找一篇关于硅谷破坏民主的 TechCrunch 文章[0]，惊讶地发现它已经从首页消失了。
我在第二页找到了它，但它的排名（44）低于那些它本应排在前面的文章——基于评论数（211）、积分（247）和发布时间（12小时前）。见截图[1]。
例如，排名第38的是一篇*更早*的文章，只有3条评论和29个积分。
排名第41的是一篇*明显更早*的文章，只有38条评论和125个积分。
所以，这篇文章的排名甚至低于一篇比它更早、投票数大约只有一半且评论数少约5.5倍的文章。
除了明显违反 HN 指南的文章之外，是否还有其他对文章的“奖励”或“惩罚”？
[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49232221
[1] https://imgur.com/a/t4Cn2Fi
查看原文
I came back looking for a TechCrunch story about SV undermining democracy [0], and was surprised to find it had already dropped off the front page.<p>Found it on page 2, but it's ranking was lower (44) than articles that it should seemingly outrank—based on comments (211), points (247) and time posted (12 hours ago). See screenshot [1].<p>For instance, at 38 is an <i>older</i> article with only 3 comments and 29 points.<p>At 41 was a <i>significantly older</i> article with only 38 comments and 125 points.<p>So, this article is ranking lower than even a much older article with roughly half the votes and ~5.5x fewer comments.<p>Is there some other "bonus" or penalty for articles (beyond those that are overtly problematic per HN guidelines)?<p>[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49232221<p>[1] https://imgur.com/a/t4Cn2Fi