HackerNews中文版

我正在开发一款复杂的多部分 3D 打印产品，需要一些来自大型语言模型的工程输入。我使用了最高级别的 Gemini Pro 推理能力，以及 Fable 和 K3 Max，并将所有设置调至最高。我面临的问题是将一个传感器安装在杠铃套筒上。该传感器是一个半中空的 100 毫米圆柱体，直径 60 毫米，带有一个直径 50 毫米、深度 50 毫米的管状切口，用于安装套筒。（实际上比这复杂一些。）我正在尝试集思广益各种夹紧机制，并评估几种设计的耐用性和可制造性。无论我怎么尝试，所有大型语言模型的输出都非常离谱，尤其是当你要求它们绘制技术图纸时。Anthropic 的表现一贯最差，而 Gemini 令人惊讶地表现最好。但它们都无法详细理解哪个部件安装在哪里，除了滔滔不绝地给出大量离谱的想法，包括在凹陷环形 TPU 夹头上的旋转凸轮夹（显然是“绝妙的枢轴”）之类的东西。这是“未被征服的领域”吗？我需要重新拾起我的 AutoCAD 了吗？ :)

查看原文

I'm working on a complex multi-part 3D-printed product, and I needed some engineering input from LLMs. I use highest Gemini Pro reasoning levels, Fable, and K3 Max with everything tuned to highest.The problem I'm facing is mounting a sensor on a barbell sleeve. The sensor is a semi-hollow 100mm cylinder, 60mm diameter, with a 50mm diameter 50mm deep tube cutout for the sleeve. (It's a bit more complex than that.)I'm trying to brainstorm different clamping mechanisms, and evaluate durability and manufacturability of several designs.No matter what I try, the output of all LLMs is absolutely wild, especially if you ask to make a technical drawing. Anthropic reliably been the worst, and Gemini, surprisingly, the best.But none understand what goes where in any detail, besides spewing paragraph and paragraph of wild ideas including rotational cam clamps over a recessed ring TPU collet (apparently, a "brilliant pivot") and stuff like this.Is this the "unconquered frontier"? Do I need to blow dust off my AutoCAD? :)

HN 提问：你如何纠正 LLM 的空间推理能力？