只需支付永久纹身的廉价费用,即可获得面试机会。

4作者: NoRagrets6 天前
最近,一场 YC 创业公司学校的派对在领英上引起了热议。<p>7 位参加 YC 派对的人离开了,身上留下了永久纹身。<p>Lemon Lime 公司邀请了一位纹身师到他们的办公室。任何愿意纹上公司标志的人,都可以立即获得面试机会。七个人最终带着永久纹身离开了。<p>用工作面试机会来换取永久纹身是不道德的。<p>问题不在于七位成年人选择纹身。而在于一家雇主将获得职业机会的途径,与对身体进行不可逆的改变联系起来。<p>这真的是“同意”吗?公司和求职者之间存在固有的权力不平衡,尤其是在 YC 这种竞争激烈的环境中。这使得“同意”比简单地说“是”要复杂得多。<p>一家优秀的公司应该根据个人的才能、判断力和品格来招聘,而不是看他们是否愿意为了获得面试机会而在身上留下永久的印记。<p>这越界了。而且还是 YC 的一家公司。就业市场真的这么糟糕吗?这究竟是否合法?
查看原文
A recent YC Startup School afterparty is making the rounds on LinkedIn.<p>7 people came to the YC after party left with permanent tattoos.<p>Lemon Lime had invited a tattoo artist to their office. Anyone willing to get the company’s logo tattooed immediately received a job interview.Seven people walked away with permanent tattoos.<p>Offering someone a job interview in exchange for getting a permanent tattoo is unethical.<p>The issue isn’t that seven adults chose to get tattooed. It’s that an employer tied access to a career opportunity to an irreversible change to someone’s body.<p>Is it really ‘consent’? There is an inherent power imbalance between companies and job seekers, especially in highly competitive environments like YC. That makes “consent” far more complicated than simply saying yes.<p>A great company should hire people for their talent, judgment and character…not their willingness to permanently mark themselves for a chance at an interview.<p>A line was crossed. And it’s a YC company. Is the job market so awful? How is this even legal?