一个令人不安的想法。一个软件边际成本为零的世界。

2作者: toddh11 天前
随着人工智能的出现,软件的边际成本正趋近于零。软件不再是稀缺资源。 这并非一个新想法,但在我考虑应用程序的盈利模式时,其影响让我深感震撼。 除非你运气好(网络效应、时机),或者已经获得“祖父条款”的优待,又或者提供卓越的价值,否则软件的自然成本就是免费的。 Intuit 是一个获得“祖父条款”优待且提供卓越价值的软件方法的例子。 而 Intuit 深知这一点。它们利用其优势,达到了掠夺性的程度。 我的妻子是一名 EA(税务师),我确切地知道 Intuit 对所有用户都施加了压力。转换成本很高,而且由于该行业是寡头垄断,实际上没有其他可供选择的替代品。 但这一切也终将过去。希望我们很快就能看到人们创造出定制化的解决方案,绕过 Intuit。哦,我多么期待那一天(我知道这有点讽刺)。 我认为,这意味着,如果你找不到一千名忠实用户,或者没有在旧模式下起步,那么尽可能多地获取用户,然后转向广告模式,才是“正道”。 或者,也许是类似“战利品/赌博”风格的成瘾机制?大数据?人人都是影响者?监管利基? 一旦你拥有了规模,广告就会奏效;然后用户可以选择付费来避免广告,或者忍受它。我们已经看到 Netflix 和 Amazon Prime 在这样做了。 呸。我已经开始怀旧了。或者是我错了?
查看原文
With the advent of AI, the marginal cost of software is trending towards zero. Software is no longer a scarce resource.<p>Not a new idea at all, but the implications hit me hard as I was considering monetization models for my apps.<p>Unless you are lucky (network effects, timing), grandfathered in, or provide exceptional value, the natural cost of software is free.<p>Intuit is an example of a grandfathered-in, exceptionally high-value software approach.<p>And Intuit knows it. They leverage their advantage to a predatory extent.<p>My wife is an EA, and I know for a fact Intuit puts the screws to all its users. Switching costs are high, and since the sector is an oligopoly, there&#x27;s really no one to switch to.<p>But that too shall pass. Hopefully we&#x27;ll soon see people create bespoke solutions that cut Intuit out. Oh, how I look forward to that day (ironic, I know).<p>This implies, I think, that if you can&#x27;t find 1,000 fans or got in under the old model, getting as many users as possible and then transitioning to an advertising model is The Way.<p>Or perhaps loot&#x2F;gambling style addictive mechanics? Big data? Everyone an influencer? Regulatory niches?<p>Once you have scale, advertising works; then users can either pay to avoid it or endure it. We see Netflix and Amazon Prime already doing this.<p>Yuck. I&#x27;m already nostalgic. Or am I wrong?