HN 提问：AI 记忆是否存在法律风险？
2 分•作者: sarjann•13 天前
随着人工智能工具的发展，所有内容都被存储起来，特别是会议记录，每一次互动都会被转录并嵌入，供代理作为上下文使用。
这难道不会造成巨大的责任风险吗？我设想在证据开示过程中，会有海量的数据，包括公司随口说出的评论。
我特别想到像谷歌这样的公司，他们对语言有规定，比如不要说“主导”或“杀死”。如果每次会议都被录音，那么查找这些内容就会容易得多，而且随着人工智能分析证据数据，可能很难忽略这些信息。
我不认为我见过任何产品能够封装这些工具，或者内置功能来清理会议记录，而且如果你目前正处于诉讼中，情况可能会更复杂，因为在这种情况下，清理可能被视为销毁证据？
查看原文
With the move with AI tools to storing everything especially meeting notes where every interaction is transcribed and embedded for agents to use as context.<p>Does this not create a huge liability? I imagine in discovery there'd be massive trove of data, including off hand comments the company has.<p>I'm especially thinking of companies like Google who enforce rules on language, like don't say "dominant" or "kill". If every meeting is recorded this would be a lot easier to find and with AI analysing discovery data it'd probably be hard to miss.<p>I don't think I've seen any products that wrap these tools or built in features to sanitise meeting notes, and it might be more complex if you're currently under litigation in which case sanitisation might be counted as destroying evidence?