HN 提问：如何高效利用 GPT 5.6 Sol？
1 分•作者: hk__2•3 个月前
我最近从 Opus/Fable 切换到了 GPT 5.6 Sol，到目前为止，我发现它非常愚蠢，以至于经常让我浪费时间。我可以问 Opus/Fable 一件事，我知道这需要一些时间，但它会几乎完美地完成。使用 GPT，我不得不不断地引导它；它的调查几乎总是以过度延伸的结论告终，经过几分钟在与问题无关的随机地方搜索；它添加了大量无用的防御性代码，就像之前的 5.x 模型一样。我确实使用了 AGENTS.md；我有一些 MCP；我启用了记忆功能。
我看到人们到处都在讨论 GPT 5.6 Sol，所以我一定有什么地方没注意到。如果您测试过这两个模型系列，您到目前为止的体验如何？您是否注意到有些在 Claude 上效果很好的事情在 GPT 上却不行，反之亦然？
查看原文
I recently switched from Opus/Fable to GPT 5.6 Sol, and so far I’ve found it so dumb that it often makes me <i>lose</i> time. I can ask Opus/Fable one thing and I know it’ll take some time but will do it almost perfectly. With GPT I constantly have to steer it; its investigations almost always end up with overreached conclusions after minutes of looking in random places unrelated to the issue; it adds a lot of useless defensive code just like previous 5.x models. I do use AGENTS.md; I have a couple of MCPs; I enabled memories.<p>I see people happy about GPT 5.6 Sol everywhere, so there must be something I’m missing. If you’ve tested both model families, what have been your experience so far? Have you noticed that some things that work well with Claude don’t with GPT or vice-versa?