HN 提问：为什么谷歌没有收录关于 AT Protocol 的信息？
7 分•作者: iameli•3 个月前
我观察了很久，发现关于 atproto 的一些非常基础的查询都找不到结果。但昨天我找到了一个查询，它让这个问题变得非常明显：“公开的 atproto 中继列表”。这是 DuckDuckGo 的搜索结果：
1. https://firehose.directory
2. https://atproto.at/relays
3. https://atproto.wiki/en/wiki/reference/core-architecture/relay
4. https://pulsar.feeds.blue
5. https://leaflet.pub/12022731-ae4f-4a13-9f7a-5738b7a83c2e
在这些结果中，Google 只找到了 3 个，而这 3 个中只有一个……没有列出公开的 atproto 中继。其他网站则完全没有出现。我尽量不去猜测是恶意行为，而是归咎于能力不足，但讽刺的是，这样一个与开放网络联系最紧密的生态系统，用户每周都会创建几十个新网站，但却未能被索引。
查看原文
I've been observing this for a while, where very basic queries about atproto stuff doesn't show up. But yesterday I found a query that makes it VERY obvious: "list of public atproto relays". Here's DuckDuckGo:<p>1. https://firehose.directory<p>2. https://atproto.at/relays<p>3. https://atproto.wiki/en/wiki/reference/core-architecture/relay<p>4. https://pulsar.feeds.blue<p>5. https://leaflet.pub/12022731-ae4f-4a13-9f7a-5738b7a83c2e<p>Of those results, Google only has 3, the only one on the list that... doesn't have a list of public atproto relays. None of the other sites are present anywhere. Trying not to assume malice instead of incompetence here, but it's really ironic that one of the ecosystems with the strongest ties to the open web, with users creating dozens of new websites every week, isn't getting indexed.