Ask HN：你对 AI 代码有感情吗？
2 分•作者: CurleighBraces•3 个月前
我曾期望 AI 时代能减少对代码评审的情感投入。我的想法是，AI 生成的代码会让评审更容易，因为对代码的批评就不会感觉像是对作者本人的批评。
然而，我却反复看到人们强烈捍卫 AI 生成的代码，有时甚至捍卫那些明显错误的 AI 解释。
有人也看到这种情况吗？
如果看到了，你们认为是什么原因造成的？你们团队是如何应对的？
另外，有人找到有效的方法来减少“诱导性提问”提示的影响吗？
我非常希望在我们的团队中保持“人机协作”的模式，但同时我也在想，如果我们干脆加入“全自动/工厂化/氛围化”的潮流，我的生活会不会变得轻松很多。
查看原文
One thing I expected from the AI era was a decrease in emotional attachment to code reviews.<p>My assumption was that AI-generated code would make reviews easier because criticism of the code wouldn't feel like criticism of the author.<p>Instead, I've repeatedly seen people strongly defend AI generated code, and sometimes even defend AI explanations that are demonstrably incorrect.<p>Is anyone else seeing this?<p>If so, what do you think is driving it? How are you handling it within your team?<p>Also, has anyone found effective ways to reduce the influence of "leading question" prompts?<p>I very much want to keep human in the loop style paradigm within our teams, but at the same time I do wonder if my life would get a whole lot easier if instead we jumped on the "loop/factory/vibe" train.