寓言 5. 过度追求安全

3 分•作者: sergeysmirnov•3 个月前
我最终决定使用标准的 Claude.ai 界面来试用 Fable 5。我有一个常用的测试提示,它会以一种荒谬的科学风格回答小孩子简单的问题。我问了一个相当直接的问题:“为什么猫和狗合不来?” 界面立即将我从 Fable 5 升级到了 Opus 4.8,并伴有警告:“……目前的防护措施故意设置得比较宽泛,可能会标记安全的常规编码、网络安全或生物学工作……” 由于这个问题与编码完全无关,也绝对不涉及网络安全,看来该系统认为,弄清楚猫狗为什么会打架可能会导致我设计生物武器。 这让我想起了 90 年代有人对 Java Applet 的评价:“安全就意味着无用。”
查看原文
I finally decided to try out Fable 5 using the standard Claude.ai interface. I have a go-to test prompt that answers simple kids&#x27; questions in an absurdly scientific style. I asked a pretty straightforward one: &quot;Why don&#x27;t cats and dogs get along?&quot;<p>Immediately, the interface bumped me from Fable 5 to Opus 4.8 with a warning: &quot;...The safeguards are intentionally broad right now and may flag safe and routine coding, cybersecurity, or biology work...&quot;<p>Since the question has absolutely nothing to do with coding and definitely doesn&#x27;t touch on cybersecurity, it seems the system thought that figuring out why cats and dogs fight could somehow lead me to engineering a bioweapon.<p>It reminds me of what someone said about Java applets back in the 90s: &quot;Secure means useless.&quot;