HN 读者们：我对 Fable 并不期待，并且对 Karpathy 感到失望
4 分•作者: behnamoh•3 个月前
* 高层原因：
这加剧了贫富差距。你认为独立开发者和个人有能力按 token 付费吗？Anthropic 的方向只会导致更多不平等，只不过这次是不平等体现在大公司和小公司之间的智能差距。
Anthropic 还故意削弱了模型在进行 AI 研究方面的能力。然后 Karpathy（一位叛逃到 Anthropic 的 AI 研究员）竟然还有脸称赞这个模型？
这些决定是 Anthropic（一家积极推动 AI 监管和禁止开源模型的公司）在收到美国政府要求下架模型的请求之前就已经做出的，所以他们不能将此归咎于政治原因。
* 地面原因：
我们原本计划在 6 月 9 日至 6 月 23 日（15 天）获得 100% 的使用率。
结果我们只获得了 3 天 100% 的使用率，以及 7 天 50% 的使用率。
而且在第一天就被削弱了：
> ... 我们将重新部署模型，并使用一套新的分类器来针对和阻止更多的网络安全任务。在短期内，一些常规任务，如编码和调试，将回退到 Opus 4.8。
如果我想要 Fable 级别的模型，已经有 GPT-5.5-pro（不知为何在 Codex 中无法使用），我可以用我的订阅来使用它。Fable 没有任何值得一提的地方。
查看原文
* High level reasons:<p>It increases the gap between the rich and the poor. You think indie devs and individuals have the resources to pay per token? The direction Anthropic is taking is one that leads to more inequality, only this time it's intelligence inequality between small and large corps.<p>Anthropic also intentionally crippled the model when it comes to doing AI research. And then Karpathy (an AI researcher who defected to Anthropic) has the audacity to praise the model?<p>These decisions were already made by Anthropic (a company that actively wants AI regulation and banning of open source models) BEFORE the USG request to take down the model, so they can't blame the politics for this.<p>* Earthly reasons:<p>We were originally going to get 100% usage from June 9th to June 23rd (15 days)<p>Instead we got 100% usage for 3 days and 50% usage for 7.<p>And it's nerfed on day 1:<p>> ... we're redeploying the model with a new set of classifiers to target and block more cybersecurity tasks. In the near term, some routine tasks like coding and debugging will fall back to Opus 4.8<p>If I want Fable-class of models, there's already GPT-5.5-pro (not accessible in Codex, for some reason) which I can use with my subscription. Nothing about Fable