HN 提问:是否存在一个“无强制 AI”的开发工作静默市场?
3 分•作者: reinhardt•4 个月前
在我看来,那些因被强制接受人工智能(AI)的炒作而精疲力尽的软件工程师们发出的反对声音,最近似乎越来越响亮。就在本周,我阅读了多篇帖子,包括在这里(例如 [1]、[2])和 Reddit 上(例如 [3]、[4]),其中有数百名开发者评论说,他们早已度过了怀疑和矛盾的阶段,进入了悲伤的五个阶段中的一个或多个。
这并不是说他们占了大多数:那些宣称“AI 使我效率提高了 100 倍”、“我几个月没手动写代码了,而且很喜欢”、“要么适应,要么被淘汰”的“真信徒”们的帖子并没有减少,仍然占据着绝大部分,尤其是在 LinkedIn 等平台上,因为在那里表达异议可能会对你的工作和未来的就业能力产生实际影响(我可能已经为此付出了沉重代价,因为我曾因模糊的“不匹配”原因被裁员)。但即便如此,那些不信者,从轻度怀疑者到完全的反对者,确实比六个月或一年前更加活跃。
问题:
1. 你是否也注意到了这种转变,还是仅仅是我的社交媒体算法在推送这些内容?
2. 在接受这是新常态之前,我们(开发者)能现实地做些什么?提前退休是一个选择,有些人已经这样做了([5])或者计划在未来几年内退休。
我本人也正在认真考虑提前退休(至少是退出科技行业),但最近一位招聘人员联系了我,他提供的职位中,除了其他内容外,还提到了“零 AI 辅助编码”。我眼前一亮,但这同时也让我思考:是否还有更多公司像这样低调行事?能否有一批关键数量的、敢于发声的、反抗的开发者宣称“我不会被欺负、羞辱或强迫进行代理式编码”,从而真正改变 AI 编码不可避免的叙事?也许那些反潮流的公司和创始人可以开始宣传“有机、人工编写”的代码,作为吸引那些拒绝屈服于 AI 指令的经验丰富的工匠的质量信号和福利?也许我只是在做白日梦,以上所有问题的答案都是否定的,但我仍处于悲伤过程的早期阶段,介于否认和愤怒之间,而不是抑郁,更不用说接受了。
查看原文
It seems to me that the dissenting voices from software engineers burned out after having the AI hype shoved down their throats have been growing louder lately. Just this week I read several posts both here (e.g. [1], [2]) and on Reddit (e.g. [3], [4]) with hundreds of comments from devs who have long moved past skepticism and ambivalence into one or more of the five stages of grief.<p>That's not to say they're the majority by any means: the "I am 100x more productive with AI," "I haven't hand-coded in months and love it," "adapt or become irrelevant" posts by True Believers haven't slowed down and still make up the lion's share, especially on places like LinkedIn, where voicing dissent can have real-world consequences for your job and future employability (I may have learned this the hard way after being laid off for nebulous "misalignment" reasons). But still, the non-believers, from mild skeptics to full-on haters, do seem more vocal than, say, six months or a year ago.<p>Questions:<p>1. Have you noticed this shift too, or is it just my social media algorithm surfacing these more?<p>2. What can we (devs) realistically do before accepting this as the new normal? Early retirement is one option, and some have already taken it ([5]) or plan to in the coming years.<p>I'm seriously considering early retirement too (at least from tech) but I was recently contacted by a recruiter for a role that, among other things, mentions "zero AI-assisted coding." My eyes lit up, but it also got me thinking: are there more companies like this just keeping a low profile? Could a critical mass of vocal, defiant devs proclaiming "I will not be bullied, shamed, or forced into agentic coding" actually shift the narrative that AI coding is inevitable? Could contrarian companies and founders start advertising "organic, human-written" code as a quality signal and a perk for attracting experienced craftsmen who refuse to bow to AI mandates? Maybe I'm just daydreaming and the answer to all of the above is no but I'm still early in the grieving process, somewhere between denial and anger rather than depression, let alone acceptance.<p>[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48668199<p>[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48651675<p>[3] https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/1ueidyv/software_engineers_are_facing_an_identity_crisis/<p>[4] https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/1ufed4k/software_engineers_are_facing_an_existential/<p>[5] https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/1uew891/older_tech_workers_are_tapping_out_taking_early/