Ask HN：声称“未复制源代码”是否仍然是充分的版权辩护理由？
3 分•作者: oscgam1•4 个月前
我们都熟悉柯基事件：https://x.com/mfts0/status/2070080422482977095
随着大型语言模型（LLM）极大地降低了创建新应用的门槛，我看到了更多关于版权和不正当竞争的案例。
我曾见过并参与过其中一些案例。通常需要专家证人。
很好奇社区对此事的看法。
“现在软件开发者正在体会作者和艺术家曾经的感受”。https://x.com/PriyRanjan96/status/2070204156703568377
有几项主张是：复制用户界面是可以的，你的产品不够差异化。
以下是对该情况的法律评估：https://x.com/jessebradner/status/2070492879718350986
查看原文
We are all familiar with the Corgi event: https://x.com/mfts0/status/2070080422482977095<p>With the barrier to create new apps having dropped significantly thanks to LLMs, I am seeing more cases about copyright and unfair competition.<p>I've seen and participated in some of these cases. Usually expert witnesses are required.<p>Curious to hear the community stance on this one.<p>"Now software developers are feeling what authors and artist felt". https://x.com/PriyRanjan96/status/2070204156703568377<p>There are several claims of: Copying UI is Ok, your product is not undifferentiated enough.<p>Here is a legal assessment of the situation: https://x.com/jessebradner/status/2070492879718350986