关于阿西莫夫式人工智能的思考:超越大型语言模型与创意机器

1 分•作者: pyeri•4 个月前
艾萨莫夫式人工智能是理想宇宙中应出现的那种理想人工智能——它旨在取代大众的艰辛痛苦和劳作,而不是那种力图成为商人乌托邦、取代知识工作者的人工智能。 意图是任何实施中最重要的一环,而我们正亲眼目睹当前人工智能实施的后果:工人日复一日地被解雇,人类日复一日地相互竞争,看谁更能给上级留下深刻印象,而这些都基于一些肤浅的指标。人工智能将成为“未来”的宏大叙事正在涌现,而“使用人工智能,否则将在科技市场中灭亡”的建议也反复出现。那么,谁真正从这些事件中获益,谁又在损失?我想知道是否有人认真思考过这个更宏大的问题,还是像其他人一样,只是公司机器上的一个齿轮。 现在是时候按下“暂停人工智能”的按钮,稍作喘息,好好反思一下到底发生了什么。而且,这样做并不会发生什么大灾难。中国不会在竞赛中领先——即使它领先了,又能为这里发生的一切辩护吗? 我真心希望有那么一个人,拥有足够的权力和影响力,能够按下这个暂停按钮——或者至少说服他人这样做。这对于当前的人类来说将是最好的事情。通过这样做,我们或许可以避免大规模的社会崩溃,而且这样做真的没有任何坏处。
查看原文
Asimovian AI is the ideal AI that should have emerged in an ideal universe — the AI intended to replace the grueling pains and labors of the masses, not the one striving to become a businessman&#x27;s utopia of intellectual worker replacement.<p>Intention is the most important aspect of any implementation, and we are seeing the results of current AI implementation right in front of us: workers getting sacked with each passing day, humanity competing with itself day in and day out over who impresses their superiors more on these token metrics, emerging glorious narratives of how AI will be &#x27;The Future&#x27;, the recurring advice of &#x27;Use AI or perish in the tech market&#x27;. Now who really gains from these events and who loses? I wonder if anyone ever gives serious thought to this broader question or just keeps being a cog in the corporate wheel like everyone else.<p>It&#x27;s high time we pushed the &quot;Pause AI&quot; button right now and take a breather and reflect a bit on what exactly is going on here. And no, no big catastrophe is going to happen if we do that. China isn&#x27;t going to get ahead in the race - and even if it did, how does that justify everything else that&#x27;s happening here?<p>I really hope there is someone out there with enough clout and influence who can push this pause button - or at least persuade others to do so. That would be the best thing to happen to humanity at this point. By doing so, we might prevent a massive societal collapse and there is really no downside to this.