HN 读者请注意：Claude 在生物学领域完全无法使用
4 分•作者: Protostome•6 天前
我发现使用 Claude 进行基础生物学研究变得极其困难。我并非指任何与生物武器开发相关的研究，而是指一些非常直接的免疫学问题，这些问题几乎总是会被标记。
我完全理解设置安全防护的必要性，但实际上，这些防护措施会大大降低该工具在合法科学研究中的实用性。有时感觉这个模型更适合“氛围编码”（vibe coding），而不是作为一名严肃的研究助手。
更有趣的是，你可以将 Claude 的代码与 RFdiffusion 和 Alphafold 等分子设计模型结合起来开发真正的生物武器，但由于这属于软件领域，提示不会受到任何标记。
这些模型甚至可以在消费级 GPU 上运行，因此几乎没有访问限制。
是否有人有过类似的经历？
查看原文
I've found that doing basic biology research with Claude has become extremely difficult. I'm not talking about anything remotely related to developing a bioweapon, just straightforward immunology questions that almost always end up being flagged.<p>I completely understand the need for guardrails, but in practice they can significantly reduce the tool's usefulness for legitimate scientific research. It sometimes feels like the model is better suited for "vibe coding" than for serving as a serious research assistant.<p>What's more funny is that you can use claude code together with molecular design models like RFdiffusion and Alphafold to develop a real bioweapon, but since this is in the realm of software, the prompts do not get flagged at all.
Those models can even run on consumer GPUs so the limit of access is almost not there.<p>Has anyone else had a similar experience?