是否有某种说法来指代代理（agent）添加的、泄露了提示（prompt）的评论类型？
3 分•作者: xdennis•11 天前
这是一个说明我意思的愚蠢例子。假设你有以下代码：
```python
def create_background(width: int, height: int) -> Image:
...
```
你让代理为 `create_background` 使用默认值，与 `create_screen` 中的默认值相同。它会将代码更改为：
```python
# Now create_background params have default values, the same as create_screen in screen.py
def create_background(width: int = DEFAULT_WIDTH, height: int = DEFAULT_HEIGHT) -> Image:
...
```
不必要的注释是“vibed”代码的典型特征，但这种语气也让我感到恼火，因为它忽略了提示。它根据被要求做的事情来写注释，而不是以一种永恒的方式。
我在代码审查中不断告诉人们删除不必要的注释，我觉得我缺乏词汇来表达为什么这样做是错误的。
查看原文
This is a stupid example to illustrate what I mean. Say you have this code:<p><pre><code> def create_background(width: int, height: int) -> Image:
...
</code></pre>
You tell the agent to use default values for create_background, the same as in create_screen. It changes the code to:<p><pre><code> # Now create_background params have default values, the same as create_screen in screen.py
def create_background(width: int = DEFAULT_WIDTH, height: int = DEFAULT_HEIGHT) -> Image:
...
</code></pre>
The unnecessary comment is a staple of vibed code, but the tone also annoys me because it leaves behind the prompt. It words comments based on what it was asked to do, not in a timeless manner.<p>I keep telling people in code reviews to remove unnecessary comments, and I feel I lack the vocabulary to express why this is bad.