HackerNews中文版

一个真实的问题。在过去的六个月里，我每天查看 HN 最佳 RSS 订阅源，都能看到关于 AI“写出糟糕的代码”、“引入 Bug”、“制造技术债务”或类似内容的帖子。我这么说可能会树敌不少，但人们是否意识到代码只是达到目的的手段？用户不在乎代码是 AI 写的还是人工写的，也不在乎你用了哪个框架。他们只关心产品是否能正常工作。我是一名拥有 20 多年软件工程师经验的人，说出这些话。让我们面对现实：当我手动发布产品的 1.0 版本时，AI 辅助的版本可能已经部署了 10 倍的速度。届时，已经有足够多的真实反馈浮现，可以识别出主要问题，而像 Claude Code 这样的工具将能够以惊人的速度修复并发布 2.0 版本。在某个时刻，执行速度开始比代码的优雅更重要。

查看原文

Genuine question.Over the past six months, there hasn’t been a single day where I’ve checked the HN Best RSS feed without seeing a post about how AI “writes bad code,” “introduces bugs,” “creates technical debt,” or something along those lines.I’ll probably make a lot of enemies by saying this, but do people realize that code is just a means to an end?Users don’t care whether the code was written by AI or by hand, or which framework you used. They care that the product works.I say this as someone who has spent more than 20 years honing their craft as a software engineer.Let’s face it: by the time I manually ship version 1.0 of a product, the AI-assisted version could have been deployed 10x faster. By then, enough real-world feedback would have surfaced to identify the major issues, and tools like Claude Code would make it possible to fix and ship version 2.0 at an incredible pace.At some point, execution speed starts to matter more than the elegance of the code.

为什么 HN（Hacker News）社区如此反感人工智能？