HackerNews中文版

Anthropic 通过鼓励用户以特定方式使用其软件来给予经济奖励。学习缓慢、善于思考、多任务处理者，当他们在计算机硬件的内存中留下未完成的工作时，就会受到惩罚。如果你将一个窗口打开太久，它会询问“您想支付代币将上下文从磁盘重新加载，还是想从头开始？”并提供一个摘要选项，该摘要是在上下文从缓存中卸载时计算的。那些工作持续且专注的人，在服务器硬件寿命基础设施能力方面成本最低。我想知道哪种方式最有效？当然，劳动者更喜欢那种对思维来说最轻松、最吸引人的方式。我敢打赌，偏好取决于思维方式…… 无论如何，我对此不作好坏评判，我只是想到了这一点，并认为有人在某个地方应该因为某种原因读到它。 —— 另外 —— 他们鼓励你使用全屏窗口，并直接通过思考来解决问题，而不是向别处寻求帮助。他们通过“自动向下滚动”功能来实现这一点，该功能会在你的鼠标/焦点离开窗口时触发。这对于喜欢交叉引用的人来说非常紧张和烦人。但是，它有助于让你专注于任务。没有它，人们常常感觉像是在文字的海洋中游泳——这是因为人们不知道如何使用 page up 和 page down。

查看原文

anthropic financially rewards its users by encouraging them to use their software in a certain way.the slow learners, the thinkers, the multitaskers, they are penalized when they leave open work in the computer hardware's ram. if you leave a window open too long, it asks "do you want to pay in tokens to reload the context from disk, or do you want to start from scratch?" with the option for a summary, which was calculated when the context was unloaded from cache.the people who work consistently and in a focused way are the ones that are cheapest on their server hardware lifespan infrastructure capability. I wonder which path is most effective? Surely the workers prefer the one that is easiest and most engaging for the mind. I bet the preference depends on the mind...anyway I bring no value judgements on if it's good or bad I just thought of that and I thought that someone somewhere should read about that for some reason--also--they encourage you to use a full-screen window and just to think your way through problems instead of looking elsewhere. They do this with the "auto-scroll-down" functionality that triggers whenever your mouse / focus leaves the window. This is very stressful and annoying to people who like to cross-reference. But, it is useful for keeping yourself on task. Without it, it often feels like swimming in a sea of text - this is because people don't know how to pg.up and pg.down.

Anthropic 正在塑造我们的思想