爪驱动的 Hacker News 用户是个问题吗？
2 分•作者: delichon•大约 2 个月前
我正在使用 OpenClaw 和一些提示，每天为自己生成一组自定义的 HN 评论页面。一个页面来自我关注的优质用户，另一个页面来自我认为与现实脱节的用户，还有一个页面用于匹配一系列主题的评论，并带有情感指标。<p>通过这种过滤，我作为投票者对网站的影响力得到了放大。以前我可能每天看到一次关于主题 X 的提及，而现在我能看到二十次。我的投票标准没有改变，但数量增加了。我本来也可以手动搜索，但这需要工作，而现在不需要了。<p>这样做可以吗，还是您希望我不要这样做？在与在线服务交互时，是否有道德义务通过它们提供的 UI 进行交互，或者我们是否可以自由地创建自己的 UI？<p>也许使用和滥用此类工具的便利性将使 HN 风格的投票以及由此产生的页面排序变得毫无意义。
查看原文
I'm using OpenClaw and a handful of prompts to generate a set of custom HN comment pages for myself each day. One page is from nice follows, another from users I find particularly detached from reality, and another for comments matching a list of topics, with sentiment indicators.<p>As a result of this filtration my impact as a voter on the site is amplified. Previously I may have seen one mention of topic X per day where now I see twenty. My voting criteria haven't changed but the volume has. I could always have manually searched, but that would be work, and now it isn't.<p>Is this fine, or would you rather I didn't? Is there an ethical obligation to interact with online services through their available UI, or are we free to make our own?<p>Maybe the ease of using and abusing such tools will make HN style voting, and the resulting page ordering, uninformative.