有争议但可能并非离谱：SpaceX 的招聘**可能**存在问题。
2 分•作者: adinhitlore•大约 2 个月前
好的，这只是社会科学的范畴，但请注意以下几点：
马斯克今天发帖，要求人们如果想加入有史以来最昂贵、也“最具创新性”的公司——SpaceX，就提供 3 个证明自己拥有杰出能力的证据。
但如果你墨守成规，又怎么能创新呢？如果只给出 1 个、2 个或 4 个理由呢？而且，为什么有人要为一个观点备受争议的人工作呢？SpaceX 似乎不可能彻底改变世界，改变它：当然，他们确实做到了……20 多年，但他们未能彻底变革 20 多年。
原因显而易见。
查看原文
OK, this is just social science but note this:<p>Musk posted today for people to give 3 proofs of exceptional ability if they want to join the most expensive and "most innovative" company ever - Spacex.<p>But how can you innovate when you follow the rules? what if you send 1, 2 or 4 reasons? and why would anyone work for someone with very questionable and controversial views? It doesn't seem possible for Spacex to revolutionize the world, change it: sure they do...for 20+ years but they fail to revolutionize for 20+ years.
And the reasons are obvious.