告诉 HN：别用 Claude Design，退订后我的项目都访问不了了
3 分•作者: pycassa•2 个月前
在 Claude Code Max 订阅 5 个月后，我想试试 Codex。然后我回到之前在 Claude Design 上的项目，却发现我无法再访问它们了。<p>这是第一次。我从未因为取消订阅任何 LLM 应用而失去过对过去会话的访问权限。<p>我之前就想试用 Codex，但遇到了类似的积分问题。他们给了我相当于月度订阅价格的额外积分，但有时间限制，因为 Claude 当时有很多问题。而当计划结束后，我就失去了对这些积分的访问权限。即使重新订阅，我仍然无法访问那些积分。<p>我对工程师们表示同情，尤其是那些在 X 上发声的工程师们。但只有当有大量粉丝的人遇到问题时，他们才会解决。<p>我曾在一家计费公司工作过，我能理解复杂的合同对增长/销售人员来说听起来不错，但对实际执行这些合同的工程师来说却很糟糕。他们复杂的速率限制现在已经成为常态，识别其他方式来计算额外使用量，所有这些实现起来可能都不容易，而且会有很多粗糙的边缘情况。但所有这些“bug”都只是用户被坑的地方，这才是问题所在。<p>我只是想在这里发帖，在 X 上多次@他们以提醒其他用户。
查看原文
I wanted to try codex after 5 months of claude code max subscription. And then I went back to my previous projects on claude design only to realize I don't have access to them anymore.<p>This is a first. I never lost access to any of my past sessions because I unsubscribed in any of the LLM apps.<p>I actually wanted to try out codex previously, but had similar experience with my credits. They gave extra credits equivalent to my montly subscription price, with some time limit because claude has so many issues that month. And as soon as plan ended. I lost access to the credits. Even after resubscribing, I still don't have access to those credits.<p>I have sympathies towards the engineers, especially the ones that are putting themselves on X. But only when someone with large following has some issue, they sort it out.<p>Having worked at a billing company, I can see how complex contracts sound good for the growth/sales folks but are also horrible for engineers actually implementing those contracts. Their complex rate limiting which is now a norm, identifying other harnesses to count them against extra usage are all probably not easy to implement without very rough edge cases. But all the "bugs" are just where the user gets screwed is what is problematic.<p>I just wanted to post this here, after tagging them multiple times on X to alert other users.