AI 时代的评审
6 分•作者: maxalbarello•3 个月前
各位目前是如何确保上线代码的质量的？现在代码审查的时间远长于代码生成的时间。<p>代码编写者和代码审查者之间存在着巨大的不对称性，这使得审查过程比以往更加痛苦。<p>我想知道，与其审查代码提交（PR），我们是否应该转向审查方案？这样，在至少另一个人批准方案之前，就不会生成任何代码。<p>一旦代码生成，参与方案的用户仍然可以审查代码，但双方都参与方案的事实应该有助于减少这种不对称性。<p>感觉我们需要一种协作和迭代方案的方式。很想听听你们的看法。
查看原文
How are you guys ensuring that the code that goes into production is high quality now that the time to review code is significantly greater than the time to generate it.<p>There is a huge asymmetry between who is generating the code and who is reviewing it, making the review process even more painful than it used to be.<p>Wondering whether if instead of reviewing PRs, we should instead move towards reviewing plans so that no code is generated before at least another person approves the plan.<p>Once the code is generated, the users who contributed to the plan can still review it but the fact that both participated in the plan should help reduce the asymmetry.<p>Feels like we need a way to collaborate and iterate on plans. Would love your thoughts on this.