问 HN:你如何运营一家由 AI 智能体组成的 Service 公司?

1作者: louismalingrey大约 21 小时前
我用大量 AI 助手运行我的小型服务公司(营销机构)已经几个月了。我运行着 NanoClaw (类似 OpenClaw),并定制了自动化流程,连接了各种工具,助手们正在为我做一些工作。当它正常工作时,真是太棒了。 但有一个缺失的部分我一直找不到,它位于界面和 AI 后端之间。 仅仅使用 Slack/Telegram 在同时处理 10 个主题时是行不通的。终端很棒,但没有记忆功能。如果你真的想用助手来管理你的公司,那么什么都行不通。 在一个理想的世界里,我需要批准 AI 建议的任务,对新的自动化和技能进行基准测试,浏览我的知识库,管理我的团队中谁可以触发什么,访问什么,并且所有这些都在我的 Claude 代码订阅上运行(当然,哈哈)。 我所缺少的就像一个桌面应用程序,一部分是驾驶舱,一部分是 Obsidian,一部分是审批队列,一部分是助手管理器,一部分是团队仪表板,一部分是看板。 这个东西已经有人在开发了吗?只有我一个人有这种感觉吗? 还是每个人都应该构建自己的版本?
查看原文
I&#x27;ve been running my small service company (marketing agency) with a ton of AI agents for a few months now. Got NanoClaw running (OpenClaw-like) with custom automations, tools connected, agents doing some work for me. It&#x27;s amazing when it works.<p>But there&#x27;s a missing piece i can&#x27;t find, at the cross road between interface and AI backend.<p>A single Slack&#x2F;Telegram doesn&#x27;t work when you&#x27;re on 10 topics at the same times. Terminal is great but has no memory. Nothing works if you actually want to pilot your company with agents.<p>In an ideal words i would need to approve tasks the AI is suggesting, run benchmarks on new automations and skills, navigate my knowledge, manage who on my team can trigger what, access what, and have everything running on my claude code subscription (ofc haha)<p>What I&#x27;m missing feels like a desktop app, part cockpit, part Obsidian, part approval queue, part agent manager, part team dashboard, part kanban board<p>Is this already being built somewhere? Am I the only one feeling this? Should everyone builds his own version of this?