What do you want to see in a next-generation GitHub in the age of AI?

3作者: skeedle6 天前
AI 编码代理正在大幅降低代码的生产成本,这可能会将软件项目的瓶颈从编写代码转移到评估、审查和安全地集成变更。 我很好奇这里的人们真正希望在下一代 Git 仓库托管平台上看到什么。 你希望 GitHub、GitLab、Forgejo、SourceHut 等平台目前没有提供什么? 我正在思考的几个领域包括: * 处理更高的 PR 数量 * 更好的维护者控制 * 机器可读的项目策略 * 在人工审查之前的风险评分 * 将 AI 代理作为拥有者、权限和信任历史的一流贡献者 * 项目更好地说明他们真正想要的变更类型 * 比 GitHub 更开放或更便携的替代方案 什么会真正有用? 什么会过度设计、令人讨厌或有害?
查看原文
AI coding agents are making it much cheaper to produce code, and that may change the bottleneck in software projects from writing code to evaluating, reviewing, and safely integrating changes.<p>I’m curious what people here would actually want to see in a next-generation Git repo hosting platform.<p>What do you want that GitHub, GitLab, Forgejo, SourceHut, etc. do not currently provide?<p>A few areas I’m wondering about:<p>* Handling much higher PR volume * Better maintainer controls * Machine-readable project policies * Risk scoring before human review * AI agents as first-class contributors with owners, permissions, and trust history * Better ways for projects to say what kinds of changes they actually want * More open or portable alternatives to GitHub<p>What would be genuinely useful?<p>What would be over-engineered, annoying, or harmful?