LLM 能扩展到 AGI 吗？
1 分•作者: mr_rajat•3 个月前
有没有什么好的论点支持或反对人工智能？我读了很多相关内容，但总是看到同样的论调，比如“它们不会思考”、“它们只是下一个词的预测器”、“它们不是生物的”。这些说法在某种程度上是有道理的，但并没有明确说明为什么它们不能扩展成完全智能的系统。像“它们没有‘意识’”和“这只是冰冷的数学”这样的论点，对我来说毫无意义，因为我们自己也不知道什么是意识，以及“思考”的真正含义是什么。
而且，为什么智能一定要依赖生物学或有机物呢？如果你们有真正有力的论点，我很乐意听取。
查看原文
is there any good argument in favor or against, I have read a lot but there is always the same argument like "they do not think", "they are next work predictors", "they are not biological". Which makes sense to some extent but does not explicitly tell why can't they scale to a completely intelligent system. Arguments like they are not "conscious" and "it's just dead math" doesn't make sense to me because we ourselves do not know what it means to be conscious and what actually is "thinking".
And why is there need for biology or organics for intelligence? If you guys have some really good arguments, I'd love to hear.