问 HN：业界是如何确定每周工作时长的上限的？
2 分•作者: saratogacx•3 个月前
我明白廉价算力不会永远持续，但从这次 AI 紧缩中似乎出现了一些独特的东西。
每周限制
这项政策似乎是从天而降，但很快就被许多产品采纳。根据你所支付的产品，削减 25% 的使用时间，这在核心概念上似乎与订阅格格不入。冷却时间和超额使用回退机制并非新鲜事，但从 5 小时到 5-7 天的限制，在程度上有着天壤之别。
我无法理解这怎么会成为一种可接受的做法，最常见的答案是“购买更多订阅”。
查看原文
I understand that the cheap compute ride wouldn't last forever but something that feels somewhat unique seems to have come about from all of this AI belt tightening.<p>Weekly Limits<p>This policy seemed to come from almost nowhere but was quickly adopted across many products. Cutting off access for 25% of the time based product you've paid for feels like it is just incompatible with a subscription at the core conceptual level. Cooldown times and over-use back-offs are nothing new but there is a drastic difference in tone from 5 hours to 5-7 days.<p>I'm at a loss to see how this became an acceptable practice with the most common answer being "Buy more subs"