OpenClaw 的数据对不上。

1作者: iliaov3 个月前
我正在搭建 OpenClaw,并寻找最佳技能和托管方案——这让我感到非常困惑。 一方面,我看到它广受欢迎: - 24.7 万 GitHub 星标。 13,700 个社区技能。 - 我读到关于中国云服务提供商的 Fork 版本。 股市上涨。 托管服务提供商提供 OpenClaw 托管服务,与 WordPress 级别相同。 但当我查看 OpenClaw 技能中心时: - 下载量最高的技能有 3.5 万次安装 - 评分最高的技能:132 个星标 24.7 万星标对比 3.5 万次安装,在我看来差距巨大。 其他观察: - 热门技能是基础连接器(Gmail、搜索、Obsidian、Home Assistant)——这些功能其他工具已经可以实现 - 很多股票/交易技能,很多是中文的 - 除了我的月度订阅费,我还需要为每次 API 调用付费(我使用 Claude) 我读到的新闻: - “龙虾交易”,即与 OpenClaw 相关的公告导致股价上涨 - 政府补贴:深圳为基于 OpenClaw 的个人公司提供高达 140 万美元的资助,无锡提供 73 万美元 - 中国公司宣布 OpenClaw 后,公司股价上涨 我想将 OpenClaw 用于我的机器人创业公司的 PMF(产品市场契合度)搜索。 我查看了 OpenClawRobotics——一个将 OpenClaw 应用于机器人的社区网站——但它似乎已经被废弃了。 注册表单无法使用。 Claude 告诉我: - 现在提供 OpenClaw 托管服务是一个重要的信号。 当新颖性消退,经常性收入成为重点时,基础设施提供商就会将项目商品化。 这是后期行为,而不是早期行为。 - “龙虾交易”是一种股市现象,而不是产品采用。 请不要误会,我喜欢 OpenClaw 项目。 但我忍不住注意到这些,并感到困惑。 你认为呢?
查看原文
I was setting up OpenClaw and went looking for best skills and hosting - and I&#x27;m really puzzled.<p>On one hand I see runaway popularity - 247K GitHub stars. 13,700 community skills. - I read about Chinese cloud provider forks. Stock market rally. Hosting providers offering managed OpenClaw hosting, same tier as WordPress.<p>But when I look at OpenClaw hub - the most-downloaded skill has 35K installs - Highest-rated skill: 132 stars<p>247K stars vs 35K installs looks like huge gap for me.<p>Other observations - Popular skills are pedestrian connectors (Gmail, search, Obsidian, Home Assistant) — things a dozen other tools already do - a lot of stock&#x2F;trade skills, many in Chinese - I get charged per API call (I use Claude) on top of my monthly subscription<p>I read news about - &quot;lobster trade&quot;, where stock rallies on OpenClaw-related announcements - Government subsidy: Shenzhen offering up to $1.4M grants for OpenClaw-based one-person companies, Wuxi $730K - company stock rallying in China when a company announces OpenClaw<p>I wanted to use OpenClaw in conjunciton with my robotics startup PMF search. I checked OpenClawRobotics - a community site for applying OpenClaw to robotics - and it appears to be abandoned. The signup form doesn&#x27;t work.<p>Claude tells me - managed OpenClaw hosting now available is the telling signal. Infrastructure providers commoditize projects when novelty has passed and recurring revenue becomes the play. Late-cycle behavior, not early-cycle. - &quot;Lobster trade&quot; is a stock market phenomenon, not product adoption.<p>Don&#x27;t get me wrong, I love the OpenClaw project. But I can&#x27;t help noticing this and scratching my head.<p>What do you think?