HN 用户提问：Anthropic 在做什么？
3 分•作者: d3ckard•3 个月前
我对 Opus 4.7 已经无话可说。这可能是自 Windows Vista 以来，计算机产品质量倒退幅度最大的一次，甚至可能是有史以来最严重的。<p>所以，我想问问大家：这到底是怎么回事？<p>我不相信是为了钱，因为他们很快就会失去订阅用户。我几乎无法再为 Max 付费了，而且在花了 4 个小时试图让模型按照我的喜好修改代码后，我几个月来第一次在工作中使用 Codex。<p>我也不相信是公司策略。模型是基础设施的一部分，就像 API 一样，也应该遵循同样的规则。最重要的是：不要破坏集成。由于新一代模型可能会完全破坏输出预期，部署它们就变成了一项组织工作，而对旧模型的支持又差得离谱。迟早，这些组织会厌倦“不断适应”。<p>所以，这到底是怎么回事？
查看原文
I'm without words with Opus 4.7. This is possibly the biggest quality regression of a computer product since Windows Vista. Or maybe ever.<p>So, here is my question to the community: what is the play here?<p>I don't buy the money angle, since they're about to be bleeding subscribers. I hardly can justify paying for Max anymore and switched to Codex at work first time in months after I spent 4 very frustrating hours trying to get the model to fix the code to my liking.<p>I also don't buy the corporate angle. Models are part of infrastructure, like APIs and the same rule apply to them. Mostly: don't break the integrations. Since new generation of models can completely break output expectations, deploying them becomes organizational effort and support for older ones is abysmal. At some point those organizations will get tired of "adapting" all the time.<p>So what's the play here?