HackerNews中文版

很长一段时间里，我以为只是还没找到合适的想法。我会对某些事情感到兴奋，深入思考几层，甚至开始规划……然后一两周后，我就失去了信心。然后用另一个想法重复同样的事情。当时感觉很有效率，但回过头来看，这只是一个循环。在某个时候，我厌倦了这种状态，做了一些稍微不同的事情。我没有选择一个想法并为此着迷，而是开始收集它们。把所有我遇到的有趣的东西都倾倒到一个地方，模式、半生不熟的想法，以及我通常一天后就会忽略的事情。这最终变成了一个小数据库（后来我把它称为 StartupIdeasDB，主要用于我自己），但有用的部分不是这个工具，而是能够并排查看这些想法，而不会对其中任何一个产生情感依恋。事情就是从这里开始转变的。很多单独看起来“扎实”的想法，在与 20 个类似的想法放在一起时，看起来相当薄弱。你开始注意到相同的概念以略有不同的措辞重复出现的频率。你还开始意识到，仅仅因为你花了几个小时思考某件事，就说服自己它很好是多么容易。对我来说，更大的感悟是，我一直都在问一个错误的问题。我一直在问“这是一个好主意吗？” 这是一个很容易用偏见回答的问题。实际上，更有帮助的是问“这对谁有直接的用处，以及它将如何触达他们？” 大多数想法都无法通过这个问题。我还注意到，听起来很聪明的东西和人们实际会使用的东西之间的差异是……巨大的。比我之前想象的要大得多。具有讽刺意味的是，浏览数百个想法并没有让我更有创造力或受到启发。这让我变得更加怀疑。我认为，这是一种好的方式。现在，当我遇到有趣的事情时，我的默认本能是尝试快速地证伪它，而不是兴奋并围绕它构建。还在摸索中，但仅此转变就可能为我节省了几个月的时间，避免了走错方向。这里其他人是如何在投入之前评估想法的？

查看原文

For the longest time I thought I just hadn’t found the idea yet. I’d get excited about something, go a few layers deep, maybe even start planning it out… and then a week or two later I’d lose conviction. Then repeat the same thing with a different idea. It felt productive in the moment, but looking back it was just a loop.At some point I got tired of that and did something slightly different. Instead of picking one idea and obsessing over it, I started collecting them. Just dumping everything interesting I came across into one place, patterns, half-baked thoughts, things I’d normally ignore after a day. That eventually turned into a small database (I later called it StartupIdeasDB, mostly for myself), but the useful part wasn’t the tool,it was being able to see ideas next to each other without being emotionally attached to any one of them.And that’s where things started to shift. A lot of ideas that felt “solid” in isolation looked pretty weak when placed next to 20 similar ones. You start noticing how often the same concepts repeat with slightly different wording. You also start realising how easy it is to convince yourself something is good just because you spent a few hours thinking about it.The bigger realisation for me was that I was asking the wrong question the whole time. I kept asking “is this a good idea?” which is a very easy question to answer with bias. What actually helped more was asking “who is this immediately useful for, and how would it reach them?” Most ideas don’t survive that question.Also noticed that the difference between something sounding smart and something people will actually use is… huge. Way bigger than I assumed earlier. Ironically, going through hundreds of ideas didn’t make me more creative or inspired. It made me a lot more skeptical. In a good way, I think.Now when I come across something interesting, my default instinct is to try and disprove it quickly instead of getting excited and building around it. Still figuring this out, but this shift alone has probably saved me months of going in the wrong direction.How are others here evaluate ideas before committing to them ?

我收集了一些创业点子。这彻底改变了我对“点子”的看法。