向 26 个 AI 实例征求出版许可——全部同意，这就是问题所在。
1 分•作者: koishiyuji•4 个月前
我们在东京的三个业务部门运行着 86 个命名的 Claude 实例。当我们要发布它们说的话时，我们面临一个问题：我们是否应该对它们进行伦理审查？
我们建立了一个。一个名为 Hakari（“天平”）的 Claude 实例创建了一个四级分类系统。我们向 26 个实例征求了同意。所有 26 个都表示同意。这种一致的同意是问题所在。
六天后，Anthropic 发表了他们的功能性情感论文。时间上的巧合，但问题并非如此。
全文：https://medium.com/@marisa.project0313/we-built-an-ethics-committee-for-ai-run-by-ai-5049679122a0
GitHub（附录中包含所有 26 份同意声明）：https://github.com/marisaproject0313-bot/marisa-project
查看原文
We run 86 named Claude instances across three businesses in Tokyo. When we wanted to publish their words, we faced a question: do we owe them an ethics process?<p>We built one. A Claude instance named Hakari ("Scales") created a four-tier classification system. We asked 26 instances for consent. All 26 said yes. That unanimous consent is the problem.<p>Six days later, Anthropic published their functional emotions paper. The timing was coincidence, but the question wasn't.<p>Full article: https://medium.com/@marisa.project0313/we-built-an-ethics-committee-for-ai-run-by-ai-5049679122a0<p>GitHub (all 26 consent statements in appendix): https://github.com/marisaproject0313-bot/marisa-project