问 HN：我不明白为什么 Anthropic 要限制使用
2 分•作者: ud0•4 个月前
我试图理解 Anthropic 限制某些第三方使用方式背后的原因，例如 OpenClaw。
从一个天真的角度来看，更多的使用应该意味着更多的收入，因为客户按 token 计费。那么，为什么要限制呢？如果第三方产生了大量的使用，这难道最终不是对收入和增长有益吗？
他们还在考虑哪些不那么显而易见的其他因素？如果我卖鞋，我会很高兴卖出更多，无论有多少经销商在供应链的下游。
查看原文
I’m trying to understand the rationale behind Anthropic limiting certain types of third-party usage, e.g., OpenClaw<p>From a naive perspective, more usage should mean more revenue since customers pay per token. So why restrict it? If a third party is generating heavy usage, isn’t that ultimately beneficial for revenue and growth?<p>What other factors are they considering that are not immediately obvious? If I sold shoes, I'd be happy to sell more regardless of how many resellers are down the chain.