HackerNews中文版

最近，Hacker News 上出现了一些关于开发者去世的帖子，这让我不得不思考自己的死亡，以及我的数字基础设施和其他只有我才能拥有/知道的数字资产/内容（例如密钥、密码等）的死亡。似乎如果我们能设计某种“存活证明”——可以通过密码学验证，用于继承流程。基本上，让你的受托人可以在 RUFADAA [1] 下执行操作肯定会很有用。但后来我突然意识到，同样的证明也可以应用于其他情况，比如在你的在线帖子、互动和参与中放置某种“肉体印记”也会非常有用——只要它不能被轻易操纵。 “存活证明”当然是一个非常难（不可能？）解决的问题……或者说，是吗？很好奇 Hacker News 认为什么才是这个明显需要一个好解决方案的问题的可行解决方案。 [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_inheritance#cite_note-11

查看原文

Sadly, there have been a fair number of HN posts lately about devs passing away. It's forced me to think about not only my own mortality, but the mortality of my digital infrastructure and other sorts of digital assets/content that ONLY I may own/know (e.g. keys, passwords, etc).<p>Seems like if we could design some sort of "aliveness attestation" - such that it could be cryptographically verifiable for the purpose of a succession process. Basically making it so that your fiduciaries can execute under RUFADAA [1] would be handy for sure.<p>But then it sort of dawned on me that that same sort of attestation could be applied to other situations like placing some sort of "mark of meat" onto your online posts, interactions and engagements could be undeniably handy as well - so long as it couldn't be gamed (at least not, "easily").<p>"Proof-of-Aliveness" is of course a very hard (impossible?) problem to solve ... or is it? Curious what HN thinks could be a viable solution(s) to a problem that so clearly needs a GOOD solution.<p>[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_inheritance#cite_note-11

Ask HN: 一个去中心化的“活体证明”？