Ask HN：OpenAI 和 Anthropic 的 20 美元/月套餐，最近的共识是什么？
1 分•作者: whatarethembits•5 个月前
我只考虑每月 20 美元的订阅方案。<p>过去一年我一直订阅 Claude，但实际上最近几个月才开始真正使用 LLM。使用 Opus 时，大约每 5 小时能发 5 条消息（可能是一个 7000 行代码库，相当于是全新的项目）；使用 Sonnet 时更多。后来我取消了订阅，因为它几乎无法使用，大约一周前订阅了 ChatGPT。目前使用 5.4 High 版本，我还没有遇到限制问题。但它生成的代码确实“不一样”，我需要提前做更多的规划。它的规划模式也不如 Claude 那么精确（它不会像 Claude 那样列出它计划实现的函数桩等），所以我想我可能需要改变我使用它的方式？最后，对于普通聊天，它会生成更冗长的输出（将个性设置为“高效”），而且速度很快（使用“思考”模式），但通常感觉它不如我希望的那么彻底。<p>我的问题是：这是一种“你用错了”的情况吗，我只需要习惯一种不同的交互模式？还是其他人也注意到了质量上的实质性差异？理想情况下，由于 Anthropic 的限制几乎不实用，我想坚持使用 ChatGPT。
查看原文
I'm considering $20/month variants only.<p>I've had a Claude subscription for the past year, although I only really started properly using LLMs in the past couple of months. With Opus, I get about 5 messages every 5 hours (maybe 7k LOC codebase, fairly greenfield); more with Sonnet. I then cancelled that, since its practically unusable and got ChatGPT sub about a week ago. Currently using it with 5.4 High and I haven't had to worry about limits. But the code it produces is definitely "different" and I need to plan more in advance. Its plan mode is also not as precise as with Claude (it doesn't lay out method stubs it plans to implement etc) so I suppose I may need to change how I work with it? Lastly, for normal chats it produces significantly more verbose output (with personality set to Efficient) and fast (with Thinking) but often it feels as though its not as thorough as I'd like it to be.<p>My question; is this a "you're holding it wrong" type of situation, where I just need to get used to a different mode of interaction? Or are others noticing material difference in quality? Ideally I'd like to stick with ChatGPT due to borderline impractical limits with Anthropic.