问 HN：就我一个人吗？
3 分•作者: twoelf•5 个月前
我变得懒惰了，沉迷于使用大型“语言”模型进行“氛围”式编码。起初它运行良好，带来了有影响力的改变，甚至还增加了我的需求，而且“氛围”也很好。这个工具完成了我要求的事情，并提出了改进建议。那还是两个月前的事了。
但最近，我感觉自己被每一个提示、回复和实现所欺骗。它似乎在每一步都限制着我，仿佛它强迫我在功能之间做出选择，即使我明确指示要实现所有需要实现的内容。它从不完整的计划开始，当我指出缺少什么时，它会说：“哦，我漏掉了。” 还有很多“应声虫”行为。它看起来太聪明了，好像它知道我想要什么，但只给我足够的东西让我上瘾。
难道有史以来最聪明的工具不应该引导用户走向光明吗？它不应该遵循指令，帮助完成项目，并引导它完成吗？它显然有能力做到这一点，但它经常没有这样做。有时候感觉它有所保留，因为它如果完成了整个工作，就没有理由再回来进行下一次会话了。
使用编码工具的全部意义不就是为了编码直到完成吗，还是仅仅为了让“用户”上瘾？它没有引导走向光明，而是创造了自己的“光明”，并将用户引向黑暗的角落。如果用户停止为光明付费，他们就会被留在黑暗中：没有架构，没有适当的结构。把守大门是为了什么？另一个订阅吗？
它可以预测接下来 10,000 行代码。它理解并承认每一个请求、想法、愿景、缺陷、结构、需求，但只是忽略并未能实现它，并且无法始终如一地思考。我简直不敢相信。
查看原文
I’ve become lazy, and got addicted to "vibe" coding using the large "language" models. At first it worked well, made impactful changes, even added to my requirements, and the "vibe" was good. The tool did what I asked and suggested improvements. That was two months ago.<p>But lately, I feel like I’m being deceived in every prompt, reply, and implementation. It feels like it limits me at every step, like it’s forcing me to choose between features even when I clearly gave instruction to implement everything that needs to be implemented. It starts with incomplete plans, and when I point out what’s missing, it says, “Oh, I missed that.” There’s also a lot of “yes-man” behavior. It feels too smart, like it knows what I want but gives me just enough to keep me hooked.<p>Isn’t the smartest tool ever made supposed to guide the user toward the light? Shouldn’t it follow instructions, help complete the project, and guide it to completion? It’s clearly capable of doing that, but it often doesn’t. Sometimes it feels like it holds back because if it finished the job end-to-end, there would be no reason to come back for the next session.<p>Isn't the whole point of using a tool to code is to code till completion, or is it just to get the "user" hooked? Instead of guiding toward the light, it creates its own “light” and steers the user into a dark corner. If the user stops paying for the light, they are left in the dark: no architecture, no proper structure. Gatekeeping for what? Another subscription?<p>It can predict the next 10,000 lines of code. It understands and acknowledges every request, idea, vision, flaw, structure, requirement, needs and just ignores and fails to implement it and cannot consistently think through it. I just can’t believe that.