提问 HN：你如何把所有编码工作都交给 AI？
2 分•作者: makingstuffs•5 个月前
大家好，希望大家都安好！
我看到很多评论和帖子，人们声称他们“真的”再也不写代码了，我很好奇大家在说这话时具体指的是什么。
我之所以这么说，是因为我每天都在使用 Claude 代码，而且是最高级套餐用户，所以我也不是在抨击 LLM 或者使用它们的人。我只是觉得很难理解，把 _所有_ 编码工作都外包出去怎么能提高生产力，尤其是在已有项目上。
我这么说的原因是，我经常需要调试和处理问题。通常，我的问题处理和诊断会让我发现，这个问题只需要几行代码就能简单修复。
当然，Claude 也可以修复这个问题，但提示、等待它给出方案、评估方案、等待它完成方案的实施，然后再评估工作，所花费的时间会比我快速做出更改并自己提交 PR 要长得多。
显然，也可以把问题处理和诊断也外包给 Claude，但我个人认为这没有效率，因为它最终会导致 LLM 更有可能出错，并更改代码库中不相关的部分。
查看原文
Hey all, hope everyone is well!<p>I’ve seen a lot of comments and posts where people have stated they ‘literally’ never write a line of code anymore and was curious as to what people mean when they state this.<p>I say this as a daily user of Claude code with a max plan, so I’m not bashing LLMs or people who use them. I just find it quite hard to understand how it can be productive to offload _all_ coding, especially on brownfield projects.<p>My reason for saying this is that I often have to debug and triage issues. Often my triage and diagnosis leads me to a point where I can see that the issue is a simple fix with a couple lines of code.<p>Of course, Claude could fix the issue but the time taken to prompt, wait for it to spit out a plan, evaluate said plan, wait for it to finish implementing said plan, and then evaluate the work would be considerably longer than just making the change quickly and making a PR myself.<p>Obviously is also possible to just offload the triage and diagnosis to Claude as well but I personally find it unproductive as it essentially ends up with a higher chance of the LLM going rogue and changing unrelated areas of the codebase.