Launch HN: Voltair (YC W26) – 面向电力公司的无人机及充电网络
2 分•作者: wweissbluth•4 天前
大家好,我们是Voltair(<a href="https://voltairlabs.com/">https://voltairlabs.com/</a>)的Hayden、Ronan、Avi和Warren。我们正在制造耐候型混合动力固定翼无人机,用于电力公司的巡检。<p>这里有一些视频:<a href="https://vimeo.com/1173862237/ac28095cc6?share=copy&fl=sv&fe=ci" rel="nofollow">https://vimeo.com/1173862237/ac28095cc6?share=copy&fl=sv&fe=...</a>,以及我们最新原型机的照片:<a href="https://imgur.com/a/bYHnqZ4" rel="nofollow">https://imgur.com/a/bYHnqZ4</a>。<p>美国有700万英里的输电线路(足够绕月球14圈)。超过50%的电力流经至少有30年历史的变压器,而这正是它们开始出现故障的节点。<p>电力公司尤其面临风险。导电体只是裸金属,上面承载着4,000-765,000伏的电压,放置在陶瓷绝缘体上,通常由木头支撑。这是一种经济高效且相对可靠的输电方式。但当木头开始腐烂,或者开口销脱落,导致带电导体掉落在有风的日子的枯树上时,就会引发毁灭性的野火,比如去年的洛杉矶帕利塞德斯大火。<p>大多数电力公司通过徒步巡逻来解决这个问题。线路工人带着剪贴板或iPad开车出去,用双筒望远镜查看清单,以目视确认一切正常。一个线路工人一天可以检查大约50-150个电杆,但一些最小的农村电力合作社(大约有20名员工)通常有大约50,000个配电杆。显然,这在数学上是行不通的。因此,一个电杆大约每10年检查一次(至少他们是这样告诉他们的保险理算员的)。<p>直升机也被使用,但起飞成本为25,000美元,更重要的是,每年都有线路工人在直升机坠毁中丧生。还要注意的是,卫星无法提供这些检查所需的毫米级精度。<p>无人机已经成为最佳解决方案。佐治亚电力公司在使用无人机后节省了60%的运营费用,而Xcel电力公司发现无人机比徒步巡逻发现了多60%的缺陷(因为无人机具有杆顶视角)。<p>问题#2:无人机受到需要不断充电和美国联邦航空管理局(FAA)超视距(BVLOS)法规的限制。因此,资金最充足的电力公司(例如,PG&E,SCE)主要派出卡车里的飞行员来收集数据。<p>目前无人机领域的领导者——Skydio和DJI——已经构建了无人机入箱解决方案。这些充电站具有固有的并发限制(一次只能使用一架无人机),并且无法在大面积土地上轻松扩展。Skydio的收费是每个箱子250,000美元,并且往返距离约为15英里(假设性能理想)。它们价格昂贵且不灵活。<p>我们的第一个解决方案(以及它为什么不起作用):我们进入YC时,希望制造能够从输电线路周围的磁场中感应充电的无人机。我们使用分体式电流互感器,用夹子将其缠绕在导线上,并收集电力。我们花了大约4个月的时间测试和开发这种硬件,并在现场成功地为几块电池充电。这是一个非常酷的概念验证。<p>但我们遇到了一个大问题。配电线路上的电流不足。这些是您家外的木杆,而不是您可能在乡村看到的高耸的钢制输电塔。一般来说,我们需要大约1兆瓦的电力——或者大约1000户家庭——通过线路才能为我们的无人机高效充电。
查看原文
Hey HN! We’re Hayden, Ronan, Avi, and Warren of Voltair (<a href="https://voltairlabs.com/">https://voltairlabs.com/</a>). We’re making weatherized, hybrid-fixed drones deployed for power utility inspections.<p>Here’s some footage: <a href="https://vimeo.com/1173862237/ac28095cc6?share=copy&fl=sv&fe=ci" rel="nofollow">https://vimeo.com/1173862237/ac28095cc6?share=copy&fl=sv&fe=...</a> and a photo of our latest prototype: <a href="https://imgur.com/a/bYHnqZ4" rel="nofollow">https://imgur.com/a/bYHnqZ4</a>.<p>The U.S. has 7M miles of power lines (enough to go to the moon and back 14 times). Over 50% of all power flows through transformers that are at least 30 years old, which is about the point where they start to fail.<p>Power utilities are particularly at risk. Electrical conductors are just bare metal with 4,000-765,000 volts sitting on ceramic insulators, usually held up by pieces of wood. It’s a cost effective and relatively reliable way to move power. But when the wood starts to rot, or the cotter pin falls out, and a live conductor is dropped on a dead tree on a windy day, you get devastating wildfires like the Palisades Fire in LA last year.<p>Most power utilities solve this problem with foot patrols. Linemen drive out with a clipboard or an iPad, and run through a checklist with binoculars to visually confirm everything is in order. A lineman can inspect about 50-150 poles per day, yet some of the smallest rural electric cooperatives (with about ~20 employees) typically have about 50,000 distribution poles. Clearly the math doesn’t work out. As a result, a given utility pole is inspected about every 10 years (at least that’s what they tell their insurance adjuster).<p>Helicopters are also used, but cost $25k to get off the ground, and more importantly, every year linemen die in helicopter crashes. Also note that satellites can’t deliver the mm precision needed for these inspections.<p>Drones have emerged as the best solution. Georgia Power saved 60% on operating expenses when they switched to using drones, and Xcel power found drones to find 60% more defects than foot patrols (because of pole-top vantage point).<p>Problem #2: Drones are held back by the need to constantly recharge and FAA beyond-visual-line-of-sight (BVLOS) regulations. In response, the most well funded utilities (e.g., PG&E, SCE) primarily send out pilots in trucks to collect the data.<p>Current leaders in the drone space – Skydio and DJI – have built drone-in-a-box solutions. These charging stations have inherent concurrency constraints (only one drone at a time) and don’t scale easily over large land areas. Skydio charges $250,000 / box, and has a there-and-back range of about 15 miles (assuming ideal performance). They are expensive and inflexible.<p>Our first solution (and why it didn’t work): We entered YC wanting to build drones that charge inductively from the magnetic fields around power lines. We used a split-core current transformer, wrapped it around the conductor with a clamp, and harvested power. We spent about 4 months testing and developing this hardware, and successfully recharged a few batteries in the field. It was a really cool proof of concept.<p>But we ran into a big problem. There’s not enough current on distribution lines. These are the wooden poles outside your home, as opposed to the tall steel transmission towers you might see in the countryside. Generally speaking, we needed about a MW of power – or about 1000 homes – to flow through the lines to charge our drone performantly.