HackerNews中文版

我一直在研究个人理财市场，最初只发现了少数几家显而易见的巨头公司。但深入挖掘后，我发现了一个长尾的初创企业，其中很多我从未听说过，包括一些推出后曾引起关注，但后来似乎又销声匿迹的产品。奇怪的是，这反而让我对这个领域更感兴趣，而不是更不感兴趣。这让我觉得，竞争本身并不是最重要的信号。更有用的问题是，为什么这么多尝试都未能实现差异化。大家在评估一个想法时，是更关注“墓地”（失败案例），还是主要关注当前的赢家？

查看原文

I was researching the personal finance market and initially found only a few obvious companies.<p>After digging more, I found a much longer tail of startups I’d never heard of, including products that launched, got some attention, and then seem to have faded out.<p>Oddly, that made me more interested in the space, not less. It made me think that competition by itself isn’t the important signal. The more useful question is why so many attempts failed to differentiate.<p>Do people here look at the “graveyard” when evaluating an idea, or mostly the current winners?

问 HN：遇到更多竞争对手会让你更有信心吗？