我想确认一下，是否也有其他人遇到类似情况，这是一种克劳德主义现象。
1 分•作者: ramenprofitable•6 个月前
你的 Claude 经常使用“我包含万物”这个短语吗？
我试着搜索了一下，但得到的大部分结果都是以 LLM 为中心的人在网上用这句话造句（废话，想知道他们是从哪里学来的……），讽刺的是，还有一篇关于“moltbook”的条目，这更让我确信了这一点。
这让你不禁思考，除了通常的对齐、投入更多算力和重新设计底层公式之外，在它的个性工程方面投入了多少精力。它回复的文风，以及例如 Claude 拥有的独特“Claude 式”表达方式。这仅仅是在训练过程中习得的，还是仅仅作为一种让它听起来更复杂一点的随机元素手动植入的？我知道大多数接触过它的人都签署了非常严格的保密协议，但如果有人能为我这个门外汉解惑，我将不胜感激。
一个在职心理医生和一些 H100 就能让一个毫无灵魂、对上下文一无所知的 Gemini 变成充满灵魂的 Claude，后者可以瞬间模仿你的语气，但当准备好辩论时，又能展现自己的风格？这显然是一种幻觉，但我觉得这正是让 Claude 在某些人眼中（……包括我，所以我可能有点偏见……）显得更有意识或更理解的原因。
也很欢迎关于 AI 个性的总体讨论。
查看原文
Does your Claude use the phrase "I contain multitudes" often?
I've tried to search for it but the things I mostly get are LLM-centered people using it in their sentences online (duh, wonder where they learned that one from.....) and ironically a moltbook entry which further confirms it for me
Makes you think that alongside the usual alignment and just throwing moar compute and redesigning the formulas underneath how much work is put into engineering it's personality. The stylometric way it replies and how for example Claude has the very claudeisms. Was this one simply learnt during the so divergent process of training or just manually wired into it as a random bit that makes it sound a little more sophisticated? I know that most people that'd ever have contact with this are under very strict NDAs but I'd be more than glad if someone could shed some light for my uninitiated I
A shrink on payroll and some H100s is all it takes to go from soulless context oblivious Gemini to the very soulful Claude that can instantly mirror your tone but get his own when ready to argue? It's obviously a illusion sure but it's the very thing that I think separates Claude as more conscious or understanding for some people (......including me so I might be a bit biased....)
A general discussion on AI personality would also be welcome