告诉 HN:Vibe 编码分类法

1作者: andai大约 3 小时前
我目前有一个这样的分类法。前 3 个级别属于程序员领域。第 4 个级别对程序员和非程序员都开放。<p>1. 传统编码(无 AI,纯手动)<p>2. 进阶编码(“添加一个名为 fooBlarg 的函数,并将其与这些数据结构连接起来”)<p>3. 指导式编码(“你能重构这段代码,让它更优雅吗?”)<p>4. 氛围编码(完全的 Rick Rubin 模式...“什么是变量?”)<p>我认为区分这些级别很有帮助,因为我经常听到人们把第 2 和第 3 级也称为“氛围编码”,而最初的含义是“甚至不看代码,完全凭感觉”。
查看原文
So I have this taxonomy right now. The first 3 levels live in Programmer Land. The 4th one is available to both programmers and non-programmers.<p>1. Tradcoding (no AI. You just do it manually)<p>2. Power Coding (&quot;Add a function fooBlarg and hook it up to these data structures&quot;)<p>3. Backseat Coding (&quot;Can you refactor this code it so it&#x27;s more elegant&quot;)<p>4. Vibe Coding (Full Rick Rubin Mode... &quot;What&#x27;s a Variable?&quot;)<p>I think it&#x27;s helpful to distinguish between these, because I often hear people call levels 2 and 3 &quot;vibe coding&quot; as well, whereas the original meaning was &quot;not even looking at the code, just going on vibes.&quot;