YC S26 申请： “请附上你最引以为豪的编程作品演示”
1 分•作者: simplydt•1 天前
在过去的六个月里，我用代码开发了几款 iOS 应用和一个完整的 SaaS (SEOZilla.ai)。老实说，我三四个月前最好的代码编写助手会话，现在拿出来提交都非常棒。它们能出色地调试代码，发现糟糕的架构选择，并进行反复的问题解决。<p>但最近呢？我主要写产品规格，做一些简单的架构决策，以及进行质量保证。助手们就...搞定了。总的来说，无论是 Opus、Sonnet、Cursor，或者你正在使用的其他工具，过去两个月的进步都非常惊人。<p>这引出了一个真正的问题：Y Combinator 在这个申请中到底在寻找什么？最令人印象深刻的会话，可能来自使用较差工具或解决更难问题的人。那些已经找到了最佳工作流程的创始人，他们的记录可能最无聊。<p>有没有其他人发现，他们“最好”的助手会话现在变得最无趣了？
查看原文
I vibecoded a couple of iOS apps & a full SaaS (SEOZilla.ai) over the past six months and the honest answer is: my best coding agent sessions from 3-4 months ago would make great submissions. Excellent debugging, catching poor architecture choices, back-and-forth problem solving.<p>But lately? I mostly write product specs, make simple architecture decisions, and do QA. The agents just... handle it. Across the board, Opus, Sonnet, Cursor, whatever you're using, the jump in the last 2 months has been wild.<p>Which raises a genuine question: what is YC actually selecting for with this prompt? The most impressive sessions are probably from people using worse tools or tackling harder problems. The founders who've figured out the best workflows might have the most boring transcripts.<p>Anyone else finding that their "best" agent sessions are now the least interesting ones?