Ask HN: Claude Code 对多动症患者来说不好用吗?
1 分•作者: chriswright1664•6 个月前
我觉得可能是这样。<p>我有ADHD(注意力缺陷多动障碍)。我在这里发过一些关于这方面的内容。这个帖子很酷,有142条评论:https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46610156。<p>Claude很强大。这周感觉更上一层楼了(在更长的任务上运行20分钟,然后把事情做对)。我不知道它是否会/何时/如何取代开发者,我知道这里很多人对此有非常强烈的看法。但对于像我这样的人来说,它就像火箭燃料。<p>但然后是ADHD。我意识到,我对于一个产品、一个应用程序、一个网站、一个想法的想法,不再只是停留在酷炫想法的列表中。现在我可以做事情了。但我需要这些东西吗?<p>所有这些活动健康吗?<p>为了让你了解一下,过去6个月我构建了:<p>- 一个ChatGPT包装器,带有一些花哨的功能和大量的系统提示工作,并以每年3万英镑的保留费卖给了一家大型IT公司<p>- 一个工具,它接受一个数据电子表格(想想人员/公司/潜在客户数据),并允许你使用占位符为任何数据构建一个提示,然后通过AI提示运行每一行/查询。需要3万家公司的网站和邮寄地址。简单。他们付了我们5万英镑(他们还获得了其他一些营销方面的服务)。<p>- 我为我们的SEO团队构建了一个内部工具,它接受一篇博文,并为他们一键完成所有页面内和一些页面外的优化。这样他们就可以做更有趣的工作。它有点用,但他们不使用它。<p>- 我构建了一个小部件,我可以将URL推送到其中,并在一天结束时获得一个个性化的2人播客(GoogleLM风格),这样我就可以在骑车回家时收听我无法阅读的内容。AI API是一些第三方工具,它很简洁,非常像GoogleLM。这是一个很酷的想法,但我不使用它<p>- 我构建了一个AI驱动的内容写作工具。两个窗格。在左侧粘贴内容摘要,它会在右侧镜像。选择左侧的文本并针对所选内容进行提示(“将这些要点变成一个详细的段落,重点关注数据和数据的冲击力”)它会出现在右侧窗格中。慢慢地,你的左侧摘要变成了正确的适当内容。支持RAG用于背景文档。我几乎每天都用它来写作。<p>- 为我的业务制作了一个交互式AI报告。“20位AI专家以及他们的建议对你的意义”。该网站的链接包括读者编码的工作电子邮件,我们抓取LinkedIn并在他们到达之前个性化文本。我们用它来做潜在客户开发,很酷。<p>还有更多,我就不继续说了。<p>但我确实刚刚构建(并完善,并“发布”)了一个工具 - https://tryultrathink.com - 它使用浏览器扩展和electron桌面小部件,可以轻松捕获任何想法、笔记、文本、音频、消息、链接等。然后你可以排序、搜索、AI等。很酷。我认为这是ADHD的梦想。我每天都在使用它。<p>但我的制作是为了帮助我的ADHD“持续不断的想法”。我用Claude Code制作了它。而且我认为Claude Code实际上是问题所在。<p>其他人怎么看?当你的“列表”可以被AI代理自主处理时,它是否强大?深度研究是另一个。当我有了一个想法时,我为什么不运行一个深度研究或专业提示,并获得一些背景信息呢。这样当我开始做的时候,我可以详细说明。我可以。那为什么不呢?也许用水量是原因?这是一个好理由。<p>一方面,未来(基本上使用现有的AI技术,甚至不需要更先进的技术)很酷。我可以保存每一个想法,在我重新思考其中一个想法之前,它已经被研究/构建/以某种方式推进了。这很酷。这很有成效。<p>另一方面,这是一个ADHD的噩梦。我睡不着觉。我构建了很多东西,但并不总是销售、测试、让人们使用。另一次,我启动了Claude Code,把它放在我的自行车篮子里,让它在我的骑行过程中继续运行。我甚至把我的笔记本电脑放在车里的副驾驶座位上,并在红绿灯处检查它。这不好吧?<p>与此同时,我将继续使用ultrathink(是的,我以Claude Code的名义命名了它)。联系我获取免费试用。也许它可以帮助你?
查看原文
I think it might be.<p>I have ADHD. I've posted a little here on that. This one was cool, 142 comments: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46610156.<p>Claude is powerful. This week feels like it has moved up a notch (running for 20mins on longer tasks and then getting stuff right). I don't know if/when/how it replaces devs, I know a lot on here have very strong thoughts on it. But for someone like me it is like rocket fuel.<p>But then ADHD. I've realised a thought I have for a product, an app, a website, an idea just no longer sits in a list of cool ideas. Now I can do stuff. But do I need this stuff?<p>Is all this activity healthy?<p>To give you an idea last 6 months I've built:<p>- A ChatGPT wrapper with a few bells and whistles and lots of system prompt work and sold it to a big IT company on a £30k annual retainer<p>- A tool that takes a spreadsheet of data (think people/company/lead data) and allows you to construct a prompt using placeholders for any of the data then run each line/query through an AI prompt. Need websites and mailing address for 30k companies. Easy. They paid us £50k (they got a few other bits of marketing as well for this).<p>- I built an internal tool for our SEO team which takes a blog post and does all the on-page, and some off page optimisations for them at click of a button. So they can do more interesting work. It sort of works, but they don't use it.<p>- I built a widget that I can push urls at and at end of the day get a personalised 2 person podcast (GoogleLM style) so I can listen on my cycle home to what I couldn't read. The AI API is some 3rd party tool, its neat very like GoogleLM. It's a cool idea but I don't use it<p>- I built a AI power content writing tool. Two panes. Paste a content brief in left and it is mirrored right. Select text left and prompt against the selection ("Turn these bullet points into a flesh out para focusing on the stats and shock of the data") and it appears in right hand pane. Slowly your brief left turns into proper content right. Supports RAG for background docs. I use it to write almost anything these days.<p>- An interactive AI report for my business. "20 AI experts and what their advice means for you". The link to site includes an encoded work email of reader, we scrape Linkedin and personalise text before they arrive. We use it as leadgen, its cool.<p>There are more, I won't go on.<p>But I did just build (and polish, and put "out there") a tool - https://tryultrathink.com - that uses a browser extension and electron desktop widget to make it easy to capture any thought, note, text, audio, message, link etc. Then you can sort, search, AI etc.. it's cool. It's an ADHD dream I think. I'm using it every day.<p>But I made it to help my ADHD "constant stream of thoughts". And I used Claude Code to make it. And I think Claude Code is actually the problem.<p>What do others think? Is it powerful when your "list" can actually be worked on autonomously by AI agents? Deep research is another one. When I have a thought, why would I not run a deep research or Pro prompt at it and get some background. So when I come to it I can detail. I can. So why not? Maybe water use is the reason? That's a good reason.<p>On the one hand the future (using basically existing AI tech, not even needing anything more advanced) is cool. I can save every thought and before I come back to one of them it has been researched/built/some how progressed. That's cool. That's productive.<p>On the other hand its a ADHD nightmare. I can't sleep. I building so much with not always selling, testing, getting people to use. The other I fired up Claude Code and put it in my bike basket so it carried on running on my cycle. I even had my laptop on passenger seat in car and checked it at lights. That's bad right?<p>In the mean time I will keep using ultrathink (yes I named it in honour of Claude Code). Hit me up for a free trial. Maybe it can help you?