Ask HN: Claude Code 对多动症患者来说不好用吗?

1作者: chriswright16646 个月前
我觉得可能是这样。<p>我有ADHD(注意力缺陷多动障碍)。我在这里发过一些关于这方面的内容。这个帖子很酷,有142条评论:https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46610156。<p>Claude很强大。这周感觉更上一层楼了(在更长的任务上运行20分钟,然后把事情做对)。我不知道它是否会/何时/如何取代开发者,我知道这里很多人对此有非常强烈的看法。但对于像我这样的人来说,它就像火箭燃料。<p>但然后是ADHD。我意识到,我对于一个产品、一个应用程序、一个网站、一个想法的想法,不再只是停留在酷炫想法的列表中。现在我可以做事情了。但我需要这些东西吗?<p>所有这些活动健康吗?<p>为了让你了解一下,过去6个月我构建了:<p>- 一个ChatGPT包装器,带有一些花哨的功能和大量的系统提示工作,并以每年3万英镑的保留费卖给了一家大型IT公司<p>- 一个工具,它接受一个数据电子表格(想想人员/公司/潜在客户数据),并允许你使用占位符为任何数据构建一个提示,然后通过AI提示运行每一行/查询。需要3万家公司的网站和邮寄地址。简单。他们付了我们5万英镑(他们还获得了其他一些营销方面的服务)。<p>- 我为我们的SEO团队构建了一个内部工具,它接受一篇博文,并为他们一键完成所有页面内和一些页面外的优化。这样他们就可以做更有趣的工作。它有点用,但他们不使用它。<p>- 我构建了一个小部件,我可以将URL推送到其中,并在一天结束时获得一个个性化的2人播客(GoogleLM风格),这样我就可以在骑车回家时收听我无法阅读的内容。AI API是一些第三方工具,它很简洁,非常像GoogleLM。这是一个很酷的想法,但我不使用它<p>- 我构建了一个AI驱动的内容写作工具。两个窗格。在左侧粘贴内容摘要,它会在右侧镜像。选择左侧的文本并针对所选内容进行提示(“将这些要点变成一个详细的段落,重点关注数据和数据的冲击力”)它会出现在右侧窗格中。慢慢地,你的左侧摘要变成了正确的适当内容。支持RAG用于背景文档。我几乎每天都用它来写作。<p>- 为我的业务制作了一个交互式AI报告。“20位AI专家以及他们的建议对你的意义”。该网站的链接包括读者编码的工作电子邮件,我们抓取LinkedIn并在他们到达之前个性化文本。我们用它来做潜在客户开发,很酷。<p>还有更多,我就不继续说了。<p>但我确实刚刚构建(并完善,并“发布”)了一个工具 - https://tryultrathink.com - 它使用浏览器扩展和electron桌面小部件,可以轻松捕获任何想法、笔记、文本、音频、消息、链接等。然后你可以排序、搜索、AI等。很酷。我认为这是ADHD的梦想。我每天都在使用它。<p>但我的制作是为了帮助我的ADHD“持续不断的想法”。我用Claude Code制作了它。而且我认为Claude Code实际上是问题所在。<p>其他人怎么看?当你的“列表”可以被AI代理自主处理时,它是否强大?深度研究是另一个。当我有了一个想法时,我为什么不运行一个深度研究或专业提示,并获得一些背景信息呢。这样当我开始做的时候,我可以详细说明。我可以。那为什么不呢?也许用水量是原因?这是一个好理由。<p>一方面,未来(基本上使用现有的AI技术,甚至不需要更先进的技术)很酷。我可以保存每一个想法,在我重新思考其中一个想法之前,它已经被研究/构建/以某种方式推进了。这很酷。这很有成效。<p>另一方面,这是一个ADHD的噩梦。我睡不着觉。我构建了很多东西,但并不总是销售、测试、让人们使用。另一次,我启动了Claude Code,把它放在我的自行车篮子里,让它在我的骑行过程中继续运行。我甚至把我的笔记本电脑放在车里的副驾驶座位上,并在红绿灯处检查它。这不好吧?<p>与此同时,我将继续使用ultrathink(是的,我以Claude Code的名义命名了它)。联系我获取免费试用。也许它可以帮助你?
查看原文
I think it might be.<p>I have ADHD. I&#x27;ve posted a little here on that. This one was cool, 142 comments: https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=46610156.<p>Claude is powerful. This week feels like it has moved up a notch (running for 20mins on longer tasks and then getting stuff right). I don&#x27;t know if&#x2F;when&#x2F;how it replaces devs, I know a lot on here have very strong thoughts on it. But for someone like me it is like rocket fuel.<p>But then ADHD. I&#x27;ve realised a thought I have for a product, an app, a website, an idea just no longer sits in a list of cool ideas. Now I can do stuff. But do I need this stuff?<p>Is all this activity healthy?<p>To give you an idea last 6 months I&#x27;ve built:<p>- A ChatGPT wrapper with a few bells and whistles and lots of system prompt work and sold it to a big IT company on a £30k annual retainer<p>- A tool that takes a spreadsheet of data (think people&#x2F;company&#x2F;lead data) and allows you to construct a prompt using placeholders for any of the data then run each line&#x2F;query through an AI prompt. Need websites and mailing address for 30k companies. Easy. They paid us £50k (they got a few other bits of marketing as well for this).<p>- I built an internal tool for our SEO team which takes a blog post and does all the on-page, and some off page optimisations for them at click of a button. So they can do more interesting work. It sort of works, but they don&#x27;t use it.<p>- I built a widget that I can push urls at and at end of the day get a personalised 2 person podcast (GoogleLM style) so I can listen on my cycle home to what I couldn&#x27;t read. The AI API is some 3rd party tool, its neat very like GoogleLM. It&#x27;s a cool idea but I don&#x27;t use it<p>- I built a AI power content writing tool. Two panes. Paste a content brief in left and it is mirrored right. Select text left and prompt against the selection (&quot;Turn these bullet points into a flesh out para focusing on the stats and shock of the data&quot;) and it appears in right hand pane. Slowly your brief left turns into proper content right. Supports RAG for background docs. I use it to write almost anything these days.<p>- An interactive AI report for my business. &quot;20 AI experts and what their advice means for you&quot;. The link to site includes an encoded work email of reader, we scrape Linkedin and personalise text before they arrive. We use it as leadgen, its cool.<p>There are more, I won&#x27;t go on.<p>But I did just build (and polish, and put &quot;out there&quot;) a tool - https:&#x2F;&#x2F;tryultrathink.com - that uses a browser extension and electron desktop widget to make it easy to capture any thought, note, text, audio, message, link etc. Then you can sort, search, AI etc.. it&#x27;s cool. It&#x27;s an ADHD dream I think. I&#x27;m using it every day.<p>But I made it to help my ADHD &quot;constant stream of thoughts&quot;. And I used Claude Code to make it. And I think Claude Code is actually the problem.<p>What do others think? Is it powerful when your &quot;list&quot; can actually be worked on autonomously by AI agents? Deep research is another one. When I have a thought, why would I not run a deep research or Pro prompt at it and get some background. So when I come to it I can detail. I can. So why not? Maybe water use is the reason? That&#x27;s a good reason.<p>On the one hand the future (using basically existing AI tech, not even needing anything more advanced) is cool. I can save every thought and before I come back to one of them it has been researched&#x2F;built&#x2F;some how progressed. That&#x27;s cool. That&#x27;s productive.<p>On the other hand its a ADHD nightmare. I can&#x27;t sleep. I building so much with not always selling, testing, getting people to use. The other I fired up Claude Code and put it in my bike basket so it carried on running on my cycle. I even had my laptop on passenger seat in car and checked it at lights. That&#x27;s bad right?<p>In the mean time I will keep using ultrathink (yes I named it in honour of Claude Code). Hit me up for a free trial. Maybe it can help you?