书籍应该像软件一样更新
1 分•作者: fullstackragab•6 个月前
大多数书籍——尤其是技术书籍——都被视为最终定型的产物。
但现实是：
知识在变化
工具在演进
错误会被发现
更好的解释会出现
在软件领域，我们接受持续改进是常态。
但在出版界，我们仍然将书籍冻结在“v1.0”版本。
我正在通过一个名为 Ulomira 的平台试验这个想法：
作者发布一次，并在书籍保持在线的同时不断改进。
我很想知道这里其他人对此的看法：
书籍应该一成不变吗？
还是应该像软件一样不断演进？
真诚地希望得到作者和读者的反馈。
查看原文
Most books — especially technical ones — are treated as finished artifacts.<p>But the reality is:
Knowledge changes
Tools evolve
Errors are discovered
Better explanations emerge<p>In software, we accept continuous improvement as normal.
In publishing, we still freeze books at “v1.0”.<p>I’m experimenting with this idea through a platform called Ulomira:
authors publish once, and keep improving their book while it stays live.<p>I’m curious how others here think about this:<p>Should books be immutable?
Or should they evolve like software?<p>Genuinely interested in feedback from authors and readers.