Ask HN: 你能为提示词申请专利吗？
3 分•作者: rcarmo•6 个月前
我决定提出这个问题，是因为我与来自学术界和产业界的一些同事进行了一场相当牵强的非正式讨论。他们都不是律师，但都对我们如何在日益以人工智能为中心的世界中创造新的“事物”和知识产权，有着一些共同的担忧。<p>你可以把提示词理解为“流程”、“载体”或知识产权的任何变体，但我很想知道大家对此的看法——我特别担心的是，如果你将你的软件作为开源发布，是否有人会挑剔你的提示词，并声称它们是从他们的知识产权/软件中获取的？考虑到提示词本质上是语言，这种说法有多大的效力？一个提示词需要多么详细才能构成描述一个流程的复杂知识产权？我们可以把它看作是代码和概念的载体吗？<p>欢迎讨论。祝大家节日快乐！
查看原文
I decided to ask this question because of a rather contrived informal discussion I'm involved in with colleagues from both academia and industry, neither of which are lawyers but who share a few concerns about how we can go about creating new "things" and intellectual property in an increasingly AI-centric world.<p>You can take prompts as "processes", or "embodiments" or any variation on intellectual property, but I'd love to know what people think about this--my particular concern was that if you ship your software as Open Source, could someone nitpick over your prompts and claim they were taken from their IP/software? How valid would this be given that prompts are, essentially language? How detailed does a prompt need to be to be complex intellectual property that describes a process? Can we consider it as code and an embodiment of a concept?<p>Discuss. And Happy Holidays!